Die oude tekenfilm lijkt kinderachtig, maar de wereld daarin is eigenlijk geniaal.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Dutch grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Dutch now

Questions & Answers about Die oude tekenfilm lijkt kinderachtig, maar de wereld daarin is eigenlijk geniaal.

What exactly does die mean here, and why is it not deze or dat?

Die is a demonstrative pronoun/adjective meaning roughly that (over there / that one we’re talking about).

In this sentence:

  • Die oude tekenfilmThat old cartoon
  • Die is used for:
    • de-words (like de tekenfilm)
    • things that are a bit farther away in space, time, or in the conversation, or already known from context.

Compare:

  • Deze tekenfilmthis cartoon (close by / just introduced)
  • Die tekenfilmthat cartoon (a bit more distant / previously mentioned)
  • Dat is used with het-words: dat huis (that house).

So we say die tekenfilm because:

  1. tekenfilm is a de-word
  2. It’s something you’re referring to as a particular, already-known cartoon, not one right in front of you.
Why does oude have an -e at the end, but geniaal doesn’t?

You see two different uses of adjectives:

  1. Attributive adjective (before a noun):

    • die oude tekenfilm
    • Rules (simplified):
      • Almost always add -e when the adjective comes before a noun:
        • een oude tekenfilm
        • de oude tekenfilm
        • die oude tekenfilm
    • The only common exception is het
      • indefinite
        • singular:
          • een oud huis (no -e)
          • but: het oude huis, dit oude huis, dat oude huis
  2. Predicative adjective (after a verb like zijn, lijken, blijven):

    • … is eigenlijk geniaal
    • Here you do not add -e:
      • De film is oud.
      • De wereld is geniaal.
      • Die tekenfilm lijkt kinderachtig.

So:

  • Before a noun: oude tekenfilm
  • After a verb: is geniaal, lijkt kinderachtig
Why is it lijkt kinderachtig and not lijkt op kinderachtig or something with a preposition?

Dutch lijken works in two main patterns:

  1. lijken + adjective = to seem / to appear:

    • Die tekenfilm lijkt kinderachtig.
      That cartoon seems childish.
    • Hij lijkt moe.
      He seems tired.
    • Dat lijkt onmogelijk.
      That seems impossible.
  2. lijken op + noun/pronoun = to look like / to resemble:

    • Die jongen lijkt op zijn vader.
      That boy looks like his father.
    • Dat lijkt op een goed plan.
      That looks like a good plan.

So:

  • With an adjective like kinderachtig, use lijken directly: lijkt kinderachtig.
  • Use lijken op only when you say what it resembles (a noun/thing/person).
What’s the nuance of kinderachtig? Is it just “childish” or is it an insult?

Kinderachtig usually has a negative nuance, similar to childish in English when you use it critically.

  • It suggests something is silly, immature, overly simple, often in a bad way:
    • Doe niet zo kinderachtig.
      Don’t be so childish.
    • Die grappen zijn kinderachtig.
      Those jokes are childish/lame.

In the sentence:

  • Die oude tekenfilm lijkt kinderachtig
    → It seems childish or superficial on the surface.

The second part maar de wereld daarin is eigenlijk geniaal then flips that expectation: it only seems childish, but is in fact very clever.

Could you say kinderlijk instead of kinderachtig? What’s the difference?

They look similar but feel different:

  • kinderachtig:

    • Mostly negative
    • Means immature, dumbed down, silly in an annoying way.
    • Used for people’s behavior, jokes, stories, etc.
    • Example: Hij gedraagt zich kinderachtig. – He’s behaving immaturely.
  • kinderlijk:

    • Can be neutral or positive, depending on context.
    • Means childlike, with qualities of a child (simple, innocent, naïve).
    • Examples:
      • kinderlijke eenvoud – childlike simplicity (can be positive)
      • kinderlijk vertrouwen – childlike trust (often positive/naïve)

In your sentence, kinderachtig is the right choice because it expresses that the cartoon looks silly or immature, not sweetly childlike.

Why is it maar here? Can maar also mean “only” in Dutch?

Yes, maar has two common uses:

  1. Conjunction = but

    • Joins two contrasting clauses:
      • Die oude tekenfilm lijkt kinderachtig, maar de wereld daarin is eigenlijk geniaal.
      • Ik wil gaan, maar ik heb geen tijd. – I want to go, but I have no time.
  2. Adverb = only / just

    • Often followed by a number, amount, or limited thing:
      • Ik heb maar vijf euro. – I only have five euros.
      • Het duurt maar een minuut. – It only takes a minute.

In your sentence, maar is clearly a conjunction meaning but, because it links two full clauses in contrast:

  • Clause 1: Die oude tekenfilm lijkt kinderachtig
  • Clause 2: de wereld daarin is eigenlijk geniaal
What does daarin mean exactly, and how is it different from erin or in die wereld?

Daarin is a pronominal adverb: daar + inin that (thing).

In this sentence:

  • de wereld daarinthe world in it / the world inside it
    where it = that cartoon, that show.

Compare:

  • daarin – in that (over there / that thing we’re talking about)
  • hierin – in this
  • erin – in it (more neutral, often physical “in it”)
  • in die wereld – explicitly: in that world

You could rephrase:

  • maar de wereld daarin is eigenlijk geniaal
    maar de wereld in die tekenfilm is eigenlijk geniaal

daarin is more compact and natural when the reference (die oude tekenfilm) is clear from context.

Why is the order de wereld daarin and not daarin de wereld? Can we move daarin?

De wereld daarin is the neutral order: noun + its modifier.

  • de wereld daarinthe world in it / that world inside it

You can move daarin in some ways, but the meaning or focus changes slightly and some options sound odd.

Grammatically possible variants:

  1. Maar daarin is de wereld eigenlijk geniaal.

    • Focuses more on daarin: But in it, the world is actually brilliant.
    • Sounds like you’re contrasting “in it” with “elsewhere”.
  2. Maar de wereld is daarin eigenlijk geniaal.

    • Emphasizes that the world is brilliant in that context, not necessarily in general.
    • Feels a bit heavier, more contrastive.

The original:

  • maar de wereld daarin is eigenlijk geniaal
    is the most natural, smooth way to say:
    • but the world inside it is actually brilliant.
What does eigenlijk add here? Is it just “actually”?

Eigenlijk often translates as actually, really, or in fact, but it also carries a nuance of softening or correcting something.

In your sentence:

  • … maar de wereld daarin is eigenlijk geniaal.
    • Suggests:
      • Despite appearances,
      • If you look more closely / in reality,
      • It is in fact brilliant.

Nuances of eigenlijk:

  1. Correcting expectation:

    • Hij lijkt saai, maar hij is eigenlijk heel grappig.
    • He seems boring, but he’s actually really funny.
  2. Softening / hedging:

    • Ik wil eigenlijk weg.
      I kind of / actually want to leave (softer than a blunt “I want to leave”).

Here, it’s mainly doing (1): correcting the first impression lijkt kinderachtig.

Where can eigenlijk go in this sentence? Is is eigenlijk geniaal the only option?

Dutch adverbs like eigenlijk are quite flexible, but word order affects emphasis and naturalness.

All of these are possible, with slightly different feels:

  1. … de wereld daarin is eigenlijk geniaal.
    – Neutral, very natural.
    eigenlijk modifies is geniaal generally.

  2. … de wereld daarin is geniaal eigenlijk.
    – Sounds more like an afterthought or spoken emphasis.
    – Closer to: “is brilliant, actually.”

  3. … de wereld daarin eigenlijk geniaal is.
    – This specific order usually appears in a subordinate clause, e.g.:

    • … omdat de wereld daarin eigenlijk geniaal is.

For a standalone main clause (as in your sentence), is eigenlijk geniaal is the most idiomatic choice.

Why is it die oude tekenfilm and not dat oude tekenfilm?

Because tekenfilm is a de-word, not a het-word.

  • de tekenfilm – the cartoon
  • demonstratives:
    • deze tekenfilm – this cartoon
    • die tekenfilm – that cartoon

We use:

  • de / deze / die with de-words
  • het / dit / dat with het-words

So:

  • die oude tekenfilm = that old cartoon (correct)
  • dat oude tekenfilm would be incorrect grammar.
What does tekenfilm mean literally, and how is it different from cartoon or animatie?

Literally, tekenfilm is:

  • teken (from tekenen = to draw)
  • film (film/movie)

So it literally means drawn film, i.e. animated cartoon.

Usage:

  • tekenfilm:

    • Traditional, typically hand-drawn style cartoons, especially for kids.
    • Ik keek als kind altijd naar tekenfilms. – I always watched cartoons as a kid.
  • cartoon (in Dutch):

    • Used more for single-panel cartoons in newspapers, political cartoons, etc.
    • Also used informally in the English sense, but tekenfilm is more standard for a show/movie.
  • animatie:

    • More general term: animation (can include 3D, CGI, etc.).
    • Often used in professional/technical contexts, or for broader genres.

In your sentence, tekenfilm fits the idea of an old, drawn cartoon series or movie, probably for children.