Breakdown of De auto is groot genoeg om de kinderen op de achterbank te zetten.
Questions & Answers about De auto is groot genoeg om de kinderen op de achterbank te zetten.
Why does the sentence use om ... te after groot genoeg?
Dutch uses the pattern adjective + genoeg + om te + infinitive to express “enough to do X.” Here, groot genoeg om ... te zetten means “big enough to put ...”. The om is required in this construction; leaving it out sounds wrong. Examples:
- Het is warm genoeg om buiten te zitten.
- Ze is oud genoeg om alleen thuis te blijven.
Who is actually doing the action in om de kinderen … te zetten? The car?
No. In this kind of om te-clause, the subject is understood (generic “you/we/one”), not the car. English works the same: “The car is big enough to put the kids in the back.” If you want to make the doer explicit, you can add voor + noun/pronoun:
- De auto is groot genoeg voor ons om de kinderen op de achterbank te zetten.
What is the word order inside the om … te clause?
Complements (objects, prepositional phrases) typically come before te + infinitive:
- om de kinderen op de achterbank te zetten (object + PP + te + verb) You might see om de kinderen te zetten op de achterbank, which is possible but less natural; most speakers keep op de achterbank close to zetten. With a pronoun: om ze op de achterbank te zetten. The te + verb stays at the end of the mini-clause.
Why is it op de achterbank and not in de achterbank?
Seats are treated as surfaces in Dutch, so you sit or put someone op (on) a seat: op de achterbank. Use achterin (de auto) when you mean “in the back (area) of the car”:
- De kinderen zitten achterin (de auto).
- We zetten de kinderen op de achterbank.
What’s the difference between zetten and zitten here?
- zetten = to put/place (transitive; needs an object): We zetten de kinderen op de achterbank.
- zitten = to sit (intransitive): De kinderen zitten op de achterbank. Alternatives: neerzetten (“set down”) or the more formal plaatsen (“to place”): … om de kinderen op de achterbank te plaatsen.
Could I say … om de kinderen op de achterbank te laten zitten instead?
Why de kinderen? Could I drop the article and just say kinderen?
If I replace de kinderen with a pronoun, which form should I use?
Use object ze (unstressed) in everyday speech: … om ze op de achterbank te zetten. Formal/stressed direct object is hen: … om hen op de achterbank te zetten. Do not use hun here; in standard Dutch hun is (only) the indirect-object form.
Why is it groot genoeg, not genoeg groot?
Can I leave out om and say … groot genoeg de kinderen … te zetten?
No—after an adjective + genoeg, you need om … te. Compare:
- Correct: groot genoeg om … te zetten
- Incorrect: groot genoeg … te zetten Note that there are other patterns where om does not appear, e.g., een makkelijk te lezen boek or We hebben genoeg te doen, but those are different constructions.
Is achterbank one word, and which article does it take?
Is kinderen an irregular plural?
Does the sentence imply we’re actually going to do it now, or just that it’s possible?
Is there an alternative with zo … dat …?
Yes. You can say:
- De auto is zo groot dat we de kinderen op de achterbank kunnen zetten.
- Or focusing on the kids’ position: De auto is zo groot dat de kinderen achterin kunnen zitten. This expresses the result rather than the purpose.
Could this be confused with the separable verb opzetten?
More from this lesson
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DutchMaster Dutch — from De auto is groot genoeg om de kinderen op de achterbank te zetten to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.
- ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions