Breakdown of Tom gaat pas morgen leren koken.
Tom
Tom
gaan
to go
leren
to learn
morgen
tomorrow
koken
to cook
pas
only
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Dutch grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Tom gaat pas morgen leren koken.
What does the construction gaat leren express in Tom gaat pas morgen leren koken?
The combination gaan + infinitive is a periphrastic future in Dutch. It tells us that Tom’s cooking lessons are planned for the future—much like English “is going to learn to cook.” While Dutch can use the simple present for future (“Tom leert morgen koken”), gaat leren adds a sense of intention or arrangement.
Why is there no te before leren?
After verbs like gaan, helpen, laten, etc., the following verb appears without te. These are called the “bare infinitive” constructions. So you say gaat leren (not gaat te leren) and helpt koken (not helpt te koken).
What does pas mean here?
In this context pas means “not until” or “only.” It delays the action to tomorrow. So Tom gaat pas morgen leren koken literally means “Tom is not going to learn to cook until tomorrow.”
Why is pas placed before morgen rather than after?
Dutch places focusing particles like pas directly before the time expression they modify. By saying pas morgen, you clearly link “not until” with “tomorrow.” Putting it after (morgen pas) is possible in very colloquial speech but sounds less idiomatic and may weaken the emphasis.
Why are there two infinitives (leren koken), and how do they work together?
Leren + infinitive is a fixed verb-complement pattern meaning “to learn to [do something].” The first infinitive (leren) carries the sense of acquiring a skill, and the second (koken) names the skill itself. In Dutch you stack them without te, especially after modal-like verbs such as gaan.
Could you drop gaat and simply say Tom leert pas morgen koken?
Yes, you can. Tom leert pas morgen koken uses the simple present to indicate a scheduled future event. It’s perfectly correct and often used in Dutch. The difference is subtle: gaat leren emphasizes the plan or intention, while the present tense version is more neutral.
What about replacing gaat with zal, as in Tom zal pas morgen leren koken?
That’s also correct. Zal is the auxiliary for the simple future tense in Dutch. Tom zal pas morgen leren koken sounds slightly more formal or literary than Tom gaat pas morgen leren koken, but the meaning (“Tom will only learn to cook tomorrow”) remains the same.