Breakdown of Wij hebben stroom opgewekt in plaats van die te kopen.
Questions & Answers about Wij hebben stroom opgewekt in plaats van die te kopen.
Why does the sentence start with Wij hebben instead of We hebben?
Both are correct. Wij and we both mean we.
- we is more common in everyday speech
- wij is a bit more emphatic, clearer, or slightly more formal
So:
- Wij hebben stroom opgewekt
- We hebben stroom opgewekt
both mean the same thing here.
Why is it hebben opgewekt?
This is the present perfect tense.
The verb is opwekken = to generate / produce.
Its past participle is opgewekt.
So:
- hebben = auxiliary verb
- opgewekt = past participle
Together, hebben opgewekt means have generated or, in natural English, often simply generated.
Dutch uses this tense very often for completed past actions, especially in speech.
Why is opgewekt one word, when the verb is opwekken?
Because opwekken is a separable verb.
It consists of:
- op
- wekken
In some forms, the prefix separates:
- Wij wekken stroom op = We generate electricity
But in the infinitive and past participle, it joins back together:
- opwekken
- opgewekt
That is very common with separable verbs in Dutch.
What does stroom mean here?
Literally, stroom can mean current, flow, or electricity, depending on context.
In this sentence, it means electricity / electric power.
So stroom opwekken means to generate electricity.
Why is the word order Wij hebben stroom opgewekt and not Wij hebben opgewekt stroom?
In a normal Dutch main clause, the finite verb usually comes in second position.
So here:
- Wij = subject
- hebben = finite verb
- stroom = object
- opgewekt = past participle at the end
This is the standard pattern for a perfect tense in a main clause:
subject + auxiliary + object(s) + past participle
So Wij hebben stroom opgewekt is the natural order.
What does in plaats van mean?
In plaats van means instead of.
It is a fixed expression.
Examples:
- in plaats van koffie = instead of coffee
- in plaats van te gaan = instead of going
In your sentence, it introduces the alternative action:
- in plaats van die te kopen = instead of buying it
Why do we get te kopen after in plaats van?
After in plaats van followed by a verb, Dutch normally uses te + infinitive.
So:
- in plaats van te kopen = instead of buying
- in plaats van die te kopen = instead of buying that/it
This is similar to English instead of buying, but Dutch uses te + infinitive rather than an -ing form.
Why is it die and not het or dat?
Here, die refers back to stroom.
The noun stroom is a de-word:
- de stroom
When you refer back to a de-word, Dutch often uses die.
So:
- stroom → die
If the noun were a het-word, you would usually use dat.
In this sentence, die means it and refers to electricity.
Why is die placed before te kopen?
Because die is the object of kopen, and in Dutch, object pronouns often come before the infinitive.
So:
- die te kopen = to buy it
This order is normal in Dutch subordinate infinitive constructions.
Compare:
- Ik probeer het te doen = I try to do it
- Wij besloten die te kopen = We decided to buy it
So die te kopen is the expected order.
Could the sentence also be Wij hebben in plaats van die te kopen stroom opgewekt?
Yes, that is grammatically possible, but it sounds less natural in many contexts.
The original sentence is smoother because it presents:
- what we did
- what we did not do instead
So:
- Wij hebben stroom opgewekt in plaats van die te kopen
is a very natural way to say it.
Dutch often puts the main action first and the in plaats van phrase after it.
Is die here translated as that or it?
In grammar terms, it is die, but in natural English translation here it is usually it.
So:
- die te kopen = to buy it
Dutch uses die/dat where English often just uses it.
Could you also say om die te kopen?
Not here.
Om ... te is often used to express purpose:
- Ik ga naar de winkel om brood te kopen = I’m going to the shop to buy bread
But after in plaats van, you normally just use:
- in plaats van te ...
So here:
- in plaats van die te kopen = correct
- in plaats van om die te kopen = not correct in normal Dutch
Why is kopen in the infinitive and not a past participle?
Because it is part of the phrase in plaats van ... te + infinitive.
The main completed action is:
- hebben ... opgewekt
The alternative action is not expressed as a second completed past event. It is just the action that was not chosen:
- die te kopen = to buy it
So Dutch uses the infinitive kopen, not a participle like gekocht.
What is the dictionary form of the main verb and the second verb?
The dictionary forms are:
- opwekken = to generate
- kopen = to buy
In the sentence, they appear as:
- opgewekt ← past participle of opwekken
- kopen ← infinitive after te
So this sentence is a good example of two different verb forms being used together.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DutchMaster Dutch — from Wij hebben stroom opgewekt in plaats van die te kopen to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions