Jeg vil tage min paraply med til stationen, hvis det regner.

It can feel like both.

In Danish, vil basically expresses will/want/intend to, and in many sentences it is used where English would naturally say will.

So Jeg vil tage min paraply med ... can be understood as:

• I will take my umbrella ...
• or more literally I want/intend to take my umbrella ...

In this sentence, the most natural English translation is usually I’ll take my umbrella to the station if it rains.

Also, Danish often uses the present tense for future meaning, so you could also hear:

• Jeg tager min paraply med til stationen, hvis det regner.

That also means I’ll take my umbrella to the station if it rains.

Because tage comes after the modal verb vil.

After modal verbs in Danish, the next verb stays in the infinitive:

• jeg vil tage
• jeg kan tage
• jeg skal tage

Unlike English, Danish does not use to here, and it also does not use at:

• Jeg vil tage = I will take
• not Jeg vil at tage

So tage is correct because vil already carries the finite tense.

Tage ... med means take along / bring.

It is a very common Danish verb combination:

• tage en bog med = take a book along
• tage børnene med = take the children along

In the sentence:

• Jeg vil tage min paraply med ...

the object min paraply is placed between tage and med.

So literally, the structure is:

• take + my umbrella + along

This is normal in Danish.

Yes. In natural English, take my umbrella with me and bring my umbrella can both work, depending on context.

Danish very often uses tage ... med where English might choose either take or bring.

So:

• Jeg vil tage min paraply med til stationen
  can naturally mean
• I’ll take my umbrella to the station
• or I’ll bring my umbrella to the station

The Danish expression is more about having it with you than matching the exact English take/bring distinction.

Because in Danish, a possessive like min, din, hans, hendes, vores already makes the noun definite.

So Danish says:

• min paraply = my umbrella
• din bil = your car
• hendes bog = her book

You do not add the definite ending -en / -et after a possessive.

So:

• min paraply is correct
• min paraplyen is incorrect

Because stationen means the station, and the sentence refers to a specific station.

In Danish, the definite form is usually added as an ending:

• en station = a station
• stationen = the station

So:

• til stationen = to the station

If you just said til station, it would usually sound incomplete or unnatural in this context.

Because til shows movement toward a destination.

• til stationen = to the station
• på stationen = at the station / on the station premises

So in this sentence, the speaker is going to the station, not already there.

That is why til is the natural preposition.

Because hvis is used for a condition.

Here the meaning is:

• if it rains, then I’ll take my umbrella

That is a real condition, so Danish uses hvis.

By contrast, om often means whether:

• Jeg ved ikke, om det regner.
  = I don’t know whether it’s raining.

So:

• hvis = if in conditional sentences
• om = whether in indirect questions

Because Danish, like English, uses a dummy subject with weather expressions.

So:

• det regner = it is raining / it rains
• det sner = it is snowing
• det blæser = it is windy

The det does not refer to a real thing. It works just like English it in it rains.

Because subordinate clauses in Danish do not use the main-clause verb-second pattern.

In a main clause, Danish often puts the finite verb in second position:

• Jeg vil tage min paraply med.

But after hvis, you have a subordinate clause, and the normal order is:

• hvis + subject + verb
• hvis det regner

So:

• hvis det regner is correct
• hvis regner det is incorrect

Then the main clause changes word order.

You can say:

• Hvis det regner, vil jeg tage min paraply med til stationen.

Notice that after the fronted subordinate clause, Danish puts the finite verb before the subject in the main clause:

• vil jeg
• not jeg vil

So these are both correct:

• Jeg vil tage min paraply med til stationen, hvis det regner.
• Hvis det regner, vil jeg tage min paraply med til stationen.

They mean the same thing, but the second version puts more focus on the condition.

Because hvis det regner is a subordinate clause.

In Danish, commas are often used to mark subordinate clauses. So the comma in:

• Jeg vil tage min paraply med til stationen, hvis det regner.

is normal.

One small extra point: modern Danish allows different comma conventions, and some writers omit this comma if they are not using start comma consistently. So you may see both styles.

But for a learner, it is useful to recognize that the comma marks:

• main clause: Jeg vil tage min paraply med til stationen
• subordinate clause: hvis det regner