Log inSign up

Sutra ću opet provjeriti taj vijak i naoštriti tup nož.

Sutra ću opet provjeriti taj vijak i naoštriti tup nož.
Tomorrow I will check that screw again and sharpen the dull knife.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Croatian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Croatian now

Questions & Answers about Sutra ću opet provjeriti taj vijak i naoštriti tup nož.

Why is ću in the second position: Sutra ću opet…?

In Croatian, the future auxiliary ću/ćeš/će… is a clitic and normally goes in second position in the clause (after the first “unit” of the sentence).
So Sutra ću… is standard. You can also say Ja ću sutra…, where Ja is the first unit and ću still comes second.

How is the future tense formed here?

This is Future I:

  • ću (1st person singular of htjeti used as an auxiliary) + infinitive
    So: (ja) ću provjeriti = I will check, and (ja) ću naoštriti = I will sharpen.
    In coordinated verbs, Croatian often uses ću once and then lists infinitives: ću provjeriti … i naoštriti ….
Do I need to repeat ću before the second verb?

Not necessary. Sutra ću opet provjeriti… i naoštriti… is natural and common.
You can repeat it for emphasis or clarity: Sutra ću opet provjeriti… i ću naoštriti…, but that sounds heavier and is less typical in simple sentences.

What does opet modify, and can it move?

opet means again and usually modifies the whole action (often the first verb, and by extension the whole plan).
Word order is flexible, but some positions sound more neutral than others:

  • Neutral: Sutra ću opet provjeriti…
  • Also possible: Sutra ću provjeriti… opet (often more like “again” as an afterthought)
  • Opet ću sutra provjeriti… emphasizes again more strongly.
Why is it taj vijak (not to or ovaj)?

Croatian has a three-way demonstrative system:

  • ovaj = this (near me)
  • taj = that (near you / already known / “the one we’re talking about”)
  • onaj = that over there (far from both)

So taj vijak typically implies “that particular screw (you know which one).”

What case are taj vijak and tup nož, and why?

Both are in the accusative because they are direct objects of the verbs:

  • provjeriti (koga/što?) → taj vijak
  • naoštriti (koga/što?) → tup nož

For masculine inanimate nouns, the accusative often looks the same as the nominative:
vijak (Nom) = vijak (Acc), nož (Nom) = nož (Acc).

Why is the adjective tup and not some other form?

Adjectives agree with the noun in gender, number, and case.
nož is masculine singular, and here it’s accusative, so you get tup nož (masc. sg. acc.).
(For comparison: tupa žlica = a blunt spoon (feminine), tupo sječivo = a blunt blade (neuter).)

What’s the difference between provjeriti and provjeravati?

This is about aspect:

  • provjeriti = perfective (check once / complete the check)
  • provjeravati = imperfective (be checking / check repeatedly or over a period)

With sutra and a plan of completed actions, perfective provjeriti fits well.

Similarly, why naoštriti and not oštriti?

Aspect again, plus prefix nuance:

  • naoštriti is typically perfective: sharpen (to a finished result)
  • oštriti is usually imperfective: be sharpening / sharpen as a process

So naoštriti tup nož suggests you’ll make the knife sharp (result), not just work on it.

Is there any special pronunciation I should know in this sentence?

A few common points:

  • ću is pronounced roughly like choo (with a soft ć sound).
  • naoštriti has š (like sh in ship): na-OH-shtri-ti (approx.).
  • vijak starts with vi- (like vee), and j is like English y: VEE-yak (approx.).