بعد شوي طلع البيض من الفرن، واكلناه مع جبنة وملح.

In Levantine, بعد شوي means in a little while, soon, or a bit later.

Here it sets the time for the action:

• بعد شوي طلع البيض من الفرن = A little later, the eggs came out of the oven

A few notes:

• بعد = after
• شوي = a little / a bit

Together, the phrase often works like one time expression, not a word-for-word after little.

That is a very common question. طلع is a very flexible verb in Levantine.

Depending on context, it can mean:

• go up
• rise
• come out
• turn out
• sometimes even take out in certain patterns

In this sentence:

• طلع البيض من الفرن means the eggs came out of the oven / the eggs were taken out of the oven

So the oven context makes came out the natural meaning.

Because البيض often behaves like a collective noun in Arabic.

Even though English says eggs as a regular plural, Arabic بيض can act more like egg / eggs as a mass or category, especially when talking about food.

So in everyday Levantine, it is very natural to hear singular agreement with البيض:

• طلع البيض
• انطبخ البيض
• أكلنا البيض

If you wanted to talk about individual eggs more clearly, you might use بيضات:

• طلعن البيضات = the eggs came out

Not necessarily. In everyday Arabic, this kind of phrasing often just describes the result, not who physically did it.

So:

• طلع البيض من الفرن can mean
• the eggs came out of the oven or more naturally in English,
• the eggs were taken out of the oven

If you want to make the person explicit, you could say:

• طلعنا البيض من الفرن = we took the eggs out of the oven

واكلناه breaks into:

• و = and
• اكلنا = we ate
• -ه = it

So:

• واكلناه = and we ate it

The -ه refers back to البيض.

Because البيض is being treated as a collective/singular food item here, the attached pronoun is singular:

• أكلناه = we ate it

For the same reason as the singular verb: البيض is being treated like a collective food noun.

So Arabic is thinking of it more as:

• the egg dish
• the eggs as one food item

That is why you get:

• أكلناه = we ate it

If the speaker used a more clearly countable plural like بيضات, the grammar could shift accordingly.

In informal Levantine writing, people often leave out some hamzas.

So:

• واكلناه is a casual spelling
• وأكلناه is closer to more standard spelling

Both represent the same idea here:

• and we ate it

This is very common in texting, chats, subtitles, and informal writing.

Because the meaning is general:

• with cheese and salt

Not:

• with the cheese and the salt

So:

• مع جبنة وملح = with cheese and salt

This sounds natural when you mean the ingredients or accompaniments in a general sense.

If you said:

• مع الجبنة والملح that would sound more like:
• with the cheese and the salt meaning specific cheese and specific salt already known in the situation.

It means the eggs were eaten together with cheese and salt.

In Levantine, مع is very commonly used for food pairings:

• مع خبز = with bread
• مع لبنة = with labneh
• مع شاي = with tea

So:

• أكلناه مع جبنة وملح means they ate the eggs and had them with cheese and salt, either as toppings, on the side, or as part of the meal.

Yes. It is very natural.

The structure is:

• بعد شوي = time expression first
• طلع البيض من الفرن = main event
• واكلناه مع جبنة وملح = next event

Starting with the time phrase is very common in both Arabic and English:

• A little later, the eggs came out of the oven...

You could change the order, but the focus would shift a bit. For example:

• البيض طلع من الفرن بعد شوي still works, but it sounds a little different in emphasis.

A simple approximate pronunciation is:

baʿd shway ṭileʿ il-bēḍ min il-furn, w akalnāh maʿ jibneh w milḥ

A few helpful notes:

• شوي is often pronounced shway
• طلع is often pronounced ṭileʿ in Levantine
• البيض is often heard as il-bēḍ
• جبنة sounds like jibneh
• فرن sounds like furn

Exact pronunciation varies by country and city, but this is a good Levantine-style starting point.