Breakdown of Aan die een kant: wag; maar aan die ander kant: beweeg.
Questions & Answers about Aan die een kant: wag; maar aan die ander kant: beweeg.
Is aan die een kant ... aan die ander kant basically the same as English on the one hand ... on the other hand?
Yes. It is the normal contrast pattern here.
- aan die een kant = on the one hand / on one side
- aan die ander kant = on the other hand / on the other side
In this sentence, it sets up a contrast between two instructions or ideas:
- wag = wait
- beweeg = move
So the whole sentence presents two opposite sides of a situation.
What does kant mean here?
Why is it aan die een kant and not just een kant?
Because aan die ... kant is the normal idiomatic structure here.
- een kant by itself means one side
- aan die een kant means on the one side / on the one hand
The preposition aan is part of the set phrase. English uses on, while Afrikaans uses aan in this expression.
So learners should treat aan die een kant and aan die ander kant as fixed chunks.
Why is there die in both phrases?
Die is the definite article in Afrikaans, meaning the.
So:
- die een kant = the one side
- die ander kant = the other side
Afrikaans does not change die for gender or number the way some other languages do. It stays die.
In this sentence, die helps make the pair sound complete and idiomatic:
- aan die een kant
- aan die ander kant
Why is it een and not 'n?
This is an important distinction.
- 'n = a / an
- een = one
Here, een is used because the meaning is one side as opposed to the other side.
So:
- aan 'n kant would mean something like at a side / on a side, which is not the intended contrast
- aan die een kant means on the one side
In other words, een is stressed and contrastive here.
What is maar doing in the middle of the sentence?
Maar usually means but.
Here it links the two contrasting parts:
- Aan die een kant: wag
- maar aan die ander kant: beweeg
So maar makes the opposition clearer. It tells you the second part contrasts with the first.
In English, you might or might not explicitly use but, depending on style. Afrikaans often uses maar naturally in this kind of contrast.
Why are wag and beweeg just one word each?
They are being used as imperatives, meaning commands or instructions:
- wag = wait!
- beweeg = move!
In Afrikaans, the imperative is often just the basic verb form, especially in the singular or general command form.
So there is no extra word needed for you:
- Wag! = Wait!
- Beweeg! = Move!
That is why these words appear alone after the colons.
Are wag and beweeg also the normal dictionary forms of the verbs?
Yes.
The forms you see here are also the basic verb forms:
- wag = to wait / wait
- beweeg = to move / move
Afrikaans verbs are relatively simple compared with English. The same form often appears in several functions, depending on context.
So here:
- as vocabulary items, they are the verb forms
- in the sentence, they function as commands
Why does the sentence use colons and a semicolon?
This is mainly a stylistic punctuation choice.
The punctuation breaks the sentence into balanced parts:
- Aan die een kant: wag
- maar aan die ander kant: beweeg
The colons introduce the short commands, and the semicolon separates the two larger contrasting halves.
You could also see similar ideas written with commas or dashes in less formal or different stylistic writing. The punctuation here gives a neat, rhetorical, almost slogan-like rhythm.
Could the sentence be written without maar?
Yes, it could, but the contrast would feel a little less explicit.
For example:
- Aan die een kant: wag; aan die ander kant: beweeg.
This still works and still means the two sides are contrasted.
Adding maar makes the opposition stronger and more natural in many contexts:
- ... wag; maar ... beweeg
So maar is not absolutely required for the structure, but it is useful and expressive.
Is this a very literal sentence, or is it more rhetorical?
It sounds rhetorical and contrastive rather than purely literal.
The structure suggests:
- one impulse says wait
- another impulse says move
So it can be used for:
- inner conflict
- mixed advice
- contradictory pressures
- a poetic or dramatic contrast
Even though the words themselves are simple, the sentence has a stylized, balanced feel.
How would an English speaker best pronounce the key words?
A rough guide:
- aan: like a long ahn
- een: roughly like een with a long vowel, somewhat similar to airn/een depending on accent and carefulness
- kant: like kahnt
- maar: like mahr
- ander: roughly AHN-der
- wag: like vakh or vahkh; the g is the throaty Afrikaans sound, not an English g
- beweeg: roughly buh-VAYKH, with the same throaty final sound
The hardest sound for English speakers is usually the g in wag and beweeg. It is not a hard English g as in go. It is the back-of-the-throat Afrikaans fricative.
Can I think of this as a useful pattern I can reuse?
Definitely. It is a very reusable pattern.
You can use:
- Aan die een kant ...
- maar aan die ander kant ...
to compare two sides of almost anything.
For example:
- Aan die een kant is dit goedkoop, maar aan die ander kant is dit swak gehalte.
- On the one hand it is cheap, but on the other hand it is poor quality.
So the sentence you were given is useful not only for vocabulary, but also for learning a common contrast structure in Afrikaans.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning AfrikaansMaster Afrikaans — from Aan die een kant: wag; maar aan die ander kant: beweeg to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions