Breakdown of Die Suppe ist zu ekelhaft, als dass ich sie essen könnte.
ich
I
sein
to be
sie
she
essen
to eat
zu
too (e.g., too big)
können
can / to be able to
die Suppe
the soup
ekelhaft
disgusting
als dass
than that
Questions & Answers about Die Suppe ist zu ekelhaft, als dass ich sie essen könnte.
Why do we use als dass instead of a literal translation of "for me to eat"?
English uses "for me to [verb]" to show a blocked outcome, but German uses the structure zu + adjective + als dass. It literally translates to "too disgusting, than that I could eat it." Whenever a quality is too extreme for something else to happen, German requires this als dass clause.
Could I use an um ... zu infinitive clause here instead?
No, because the subjects of the two actions are different. The subject of the first part is Die Suppe (the soup is disgusting), but the subject of the second part is ich (I am eating). You can only use um ... zu if the subject remains the same across both parts of the sentence.
Why is the verb könnte in the Konjunktiv II form?
The als dass structure requires Konjunktiv II (the subjunctive) because it expresses an "irreal" or impossible consequence. Since the soup is too disgusting, the eating is not actually going to happen. Using könnte emphasizes that eating it is purely hypothetical.
Why does the second clause say sie essen instead of es essen, if the English translation says "eat it"?
In German, pronouns must match the grammatical gender of the noun they replace. Since die Suppe is feminine, you must use the feminine accusative pronoun sie, even though English just uses the neutral "it" for food objects.
Learn Die Suppe ist zu ekelhaft, als dass ich sie essen könnte and more in German
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free