Er spuckt keine Dose aus, was wirklich schade ist.

Questions & Answers about Er spuckt keine Dose aus, was wirklich schade ist.

Why is was used here to mean "which", instead of a normal relative pronoun like das?
In German, when you want a relative pronoun to refer back to an entire preceding clause—in this case, the whole situation of it not spitting out a can—you must use was. You only use der, die, or das when referring back to a specific noun.
Why does the sentence start with Er if the translation says "It"?
In German, pronouns must match the grammatical gender of the noun they are replacing. This sentence is likely talking about a masculine object, like a vending machine (der Automat). Since it is grammatically masculine, it takes er, but in English, we naturally translate it as "it" because it is an inanimate object.
What is aus doing at the end of the first part of the sentence?
It belongs to the verb ausspucken (to spit out). Because it is a separable verb used in a main clause, the prefix aus detaches and jumps to the end of that clause, right before the comma.
Why does the verb ist come at the very end of the sentence?
The word was introduces a relative clause here, which is a type of subordinate clause. In all German subordinate clauses, the conjugated verb (in this case, ist) is pushed to the very end of the clause.
The English translation says "a pity", so why isn't schade capitalized like a noun?
In German, schade is actually an adjective meaning "unfortunate" or "a shame". Since it is an adjective and not a noun, it isn't capitalized, even though it is often translated using a noun phrase in English.

Learn Er spuckt keine Dose aus, was wirklich schade ist and more in German

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free