Question 1

Why are there two verbs at the end of the sentence (überweisen musste), and why is musste last?

Accepted Answer

Because weil (because) introduces a subordinate clause, the conjugated verb (musste) gets pushed to the very end of the sentence. The main verb (überweisen) stays in its infinitive form and is placed just before the conjugated modal verb, exactly as it would appear at the end of a regular main clause.

Question 2

I sometimes see this spelled as müsste with an umlaut. Why is it musste here?

Accepted Answer

Musste (no umlaut) is the simple past tense (Präteritum) meaning 'had to'. If it had an umlaut (müsste), it would be the subjunctive II (Konjunktiv II), which means 'would have to' or 'ought to'. Since she actually did have to transfer the money in reality, we use the factual past tense musste.

Question 3

Is the prefix über- in überweisen separable?

Accepted Answer

No. While über- can be a separable prefix for some verbs, in überweisen (to transfer money) it is inseparable. If you used it in a normal main clause, you would say Sie überweist das Geld (She transfers the money), without splitting the prefix off.

Question 4

This lesson is about using wollen to express a claim. How would I change the weil clause to say '...because she claims to have transferred the money'?

Accepted Answer

You would replace the 'had to' structure with the subjective wollen plus a past infinitive: ..., weil sie das Geld überwiesen haben will. The conjugated modal will goes at the very end, and überwiesen haben shows that the action she is claiming to have done already happened in the past.

Sie war wütend, weil sie das Geld überweisen musste.

Breakdown of Sie war wütend, weil sie das Geld überweisen musste.

Questions & Answers about Sie war wütend, weil sie das Geld überweisen musste.

Learn Sie war wütend, weil sie das Geld überweisen musste and more in German