Question 1

Why is there a ne in je ne croyais if the sentence isn't negative?

Accepted Answer

This is the ne explétif. It is often added to the second part of a sentence after a comparison of inequality (like plus... que or moins... que) when the main clause is affirmative. It doesn't mean "not"; it just emphasizes the gap between reality and your past belief.

Question 2

Is the ne explétif mandatory here, or could I just say que je croyais?

Accepted Answer

It is optional. You can absolutely say que je croyais, and in everyday spoken French, that is actually much more common. Adding the ne explétif makes the sentence sound more formal or literary.

Question 3

If the main clause were negative, would I still use ne here?

Accepted Answer

No. The ne explétif is only used when the main clause is affirmative. If you were to say La pollution n'est pas plus nuisible que je croyais (Pollution is not more harmful than I thought), you must drop the extra ne.

Question 4

Why use the imperfect tense croyais instead of the passé composé j'ai cru?

Accepted Answer

You use the imperfect here because it describes an ongoing state of mind or an opinion you held over an unspecified period of time in the past. The passé composé would imply a sudden realization or a specific moment of belief, which doesn't fit the context of having a prior general assumption.

Question 5

I've also learned the word nocif for harmful. Could I use it instead of nuisible?

Accepted Answer

Yes, they are very close synonyms and both work well here. Nocif is often used specifically for things that are biologically or chemically toxic to health, while nuisible is slightly broader, meaning detrimental or damaging in general.

La pollution est plus nuisible que je ne croyais.

Breakdown of La pollution est plus nuisible que je ne croyais.

Questions & Answers about La pollution est plus nuisible que je ne croyais.

Learn La pollution est plus nuisible que je ne croyais and more in French