Question 1

Why is it assez logique and not logique assez like "logical enough" in English?

Accepted Answer

In French, adverbs of intensity like assez (enough), très (very), and trop (too) always go before the adjective they modify. English puts "enough" after the adjective, which is a common structural trap for English speakers!

Question 2

Why is pour used before the verb convaincre?

Accepted Answer

The fixed structure for this meaning is assez [adjective] pour [infinitive], meaning "[adjective] enough to [verb]". You need pour here to express the goal or intended result of the choice being logical.

Question 3

Since choix ends in an "x", how do we know it's singular in this sentence?

Accepted Answer

We can tell it is singular because of the singular possessive adjective ton and the singular verb conjugation est. French nouns that end in -s, -x, or -z in the singular do not change their spelling in the plural, so "your choices" would be tes choix.

Question 4

Could I use persuader instead of convaincre here?

Accepted Answer

You could, but convaincre is the better fit. In French, convaincre implies convincing someone using facts, logic, or arguments (which matches logique perfectly). Persuader is often used when appealing more to someone's emotions or personal feelings.

Question 5

How could we rewrite this sentence to practice the mixed conditional (present condition, past result) from this lesson?

Accepted Answer

To express an ongoing present condition with a past result, you use si + imparfait -> conditionnel passé. Applied to this context, you could say: Si ton choix était assez logique, il aurait convaincu le client (If your choice was/were logical enough, it would have convinced the client).

Ton choix est assez logique pour convaincre le client.

Breakdown of Ton choix est assez logique pour convaincre le client.

Questions & Answers about Ton choix est assez logique pour convaincre le client.

Learn Ton choix est assez logique pour convaincre le client and more in French