Après qu'il est parti, nous avons mangé.

Questions & Answers about Après qu'il est parti, nous avons mangé.

Since the current lesson is about the subjunctive, why doesn't après que take the subjunctive here?
This is a classic trap! Avant que (before) takes the subjunctive because the action hasn't happened yet, so it is still just a possibility. But après que (after) takes the indicative (normal tenses like the present or passé composé) because the action has already taken place and is a concrete fact. Even though you will sometimes hear native French speakers mistakenly use the subjunctive after après que, the grammatically correct choice is the indicative, as seen here with est parti.
Why is the helping verb est instead of a in il est parti?
Partir (to leave) is one of the verbs of movement and change of state (often remembered by the acronym Dr. & Mrs. Vandertramp) that always use être as their auxiliary (helping) verb in compound tenses like the passé composé.
Could I just say après il est parti without the que?
No, in French you must use après que when connecting to a full clause that contains a subject and a verb. You only use après on its own when it is followed by a noun, like après le dîner (after dinner).
Both actions happened in the past. Could I use the plus-que-parfait (had left) for the first action?
Yes! You can absolutely say Après qu'il était parti, nous avons mangé (After he had left, we ate) to emphasize that his leaving happened further in the past, before the eating. However, in casual everyday French, it is very common and perfectly acceptable to just use the passé composé for both actions, as this sentence does.

Learn Après qu'il est parti, nous avons mangé and more in French

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free