Breakdown of او پرسید که آیا برای این اقدام الزامی هست؟
او
he/she
این
this
بودنbudan
to be
آیاâyâ
whether (question particle)
Questions & Answers about او پرسید که آیا برای این اقدام الزامی هست؟
How do the words اقدام and الزامی relate to the 'Ef'âl' noun pattern we are studying?
Both contain nouns that perfectly follow the e-C1-C2-â-C3 pattern for nouns of causation or realization. اقدام (eghdâm - action/measure) comes from the root q-d-m (to advance). الزام (elzâm - compulsion/requirement) comes from l-z-m (to be necessary). Knowing this pattern helps you instantly recognize them as abstract nouns derived from those roots.
What is the function of the ی at the end of الزامی in this specific sentence?
Here, it functions as the indefinite suffix, making الزام mean 'a requirement'. However, you should note that الزامی is also extremely common as an adjective meaning 'compulsory' or 'mandatory' (for example, این اقدام الزامی است means 'this action is compulsory'). Because this sentence asks if something exists using هست, it acts as an indefinite noun here.
Why are که and آیا used together right after پرسید?
In indirect questions or reported speech, Persian often uses که (that) to link the clauses and آیا (whether/if) to introduce the yes/no question itself. While English simply says 'He asked if...', Persian literally translates to 'He asked that whether...'. This که آیا combination is standard after verbs of asking, wondering, or investigating.
Why does the sentence use هست instead of است at the end?
The verb هست is used here to indicate existence ('is there?' or 'does there exist?'). If we used است, it would be a simple linking verb ('is'), which would sound incomplete because it usually connects a subject to an adjective or noun complement. Since the speaker is asking about the existence of a requirement, هست is the correct choice.