Question 1

Why does Farsi use که and a full past continuous verb (داشتند ... نگاه می‌کردند) instead of a word like "watching"?

Accepted Answer

Farsi does not use gerunds or present participles (like English "-ing" words) after verbs of perception like دیدیم (we saw). Instead, you use a pseudo-relative clause. You introduce the observed action with که and put the verb in the past continuous to show the action was in progress while you saw it.

Question 2

How can we tell if که introduces the action we observed, or if it is just a regular relative clause describing which children we saw?

Accepted Answer

Structurally, they are exactly the same! It is the combination of a perception verb (دیدیم) and a continuous tense (داشتند ... نگاه می‌کردند) that creates this specific meaning. The continuous tense emphasizes that they were in the middle of the act when observed.

Question 3

Why does را come after مبهوت and not immediately after بچه‌ها?

Accepted Answer

The direct object marker را must attach to the very end of the entire noun phrase. Since مبهوت (fascinated) modifies بچه‌ها (children) using an ezafe, they form a single block: بچه‌های مبهوت. Therefore, را sits at the end of that block.

Question 4

Why is there a به before شعبده‌باز (magician) when the English translation says "watching the magician"?

Accepted Answer

The verb نگاه کردن literally translates closer to "to look" rather than "to watch," and it always requires the preposition به (to/at) to indicate the target of the gaze. Farsi does not have a direct equivalent to the transitive English verb "to watch" for this context.

ما بچه‌های مبهوت را که داشتند به شعبده‌باز نگاه می‌کردند دیدیم.

Breakdown of ما بچه‌های مبهوت را که داشتند به شعبده‌باز نگاه می‌کردند دیدیم.

Questions & Answers about ما بچه‌های مبهوت را که داشتند به شعبده‌باز نگاه می‌کردند دیدیم.

Learn ما بچه‌های مبهوت را که داشتند به شعبده‌باز نگاه می‌کردند دیدیم and more in Farsi