اینکه آب‌های زیرزمینی تبخیر می‌شوند، به کوچ مردم بومی ختم می‌شود.

Questions & Answers about اینکه آب‌های زیرزمینی تبخیر می‌شوند، به کوچ مردم بومی ختم می‌شود.

Why does the sentence use the plural mi-shavand for the first verb, but the singular mi-shavad for the second?
The first verb, tabkhir mi-shavand, matches its plural subject ab-ha-ye zir-zamini (underground waters). The second verb, khatm mi-shavad, is singular because its subject is the entire first clause introduced by in-ke (The fact that...). An entire clause acts as a single, singular concept.
How does the prepositional verb khatm shodan be connect to the outcome in this sentence?
The verb khatm shodan literally means to end or to conclude. By adding the preposition be, it becomes a verb of consequence meaning to result in or to end in. The outcome immediately follows be, which in this case is the noun phrase kuch-e mardom-e bumi (the migration of indigenous people).
The lesson says we can use a noun or a long infinitive after be. Which is used here, and how would the other look?
This sentence uses the noun kuch (migration). If you wanted to use a long infinitive instead, you would use the full verb kuch kardan (to migrate) and say be kuch kardan-e mardom-e bumi khatm mi-shavad. Both are perfectly natural and mean the same thing in Farsi.
What is the exact purpose of in-ke at the very beginning of the sentence?
in-ke translates to the fact that or simply that. It wraps around a full sentence (underground waters evaporate) and turns it into a single noun clause, allowing that entire situation to act as the subject that triggers the outcome at the end of the sentence.

Learn اینکه آب‌های زیرزمینی تبخیر می‌شوند، به کوچ مردم بومی ختم می‌شود and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free