Question 1

The current lesson focuses on abstract nouns ending in -i. How is honarnamayi (هنرنمایی) formed, and is it an adverb here?

Accepted Answer

While our current lesson looks at using the -i suffix to make adverbial phrases, here honarnamayi acts as a regular noun meaning artistic performance. It is formed from honar (art) plus nama (present root of to show) plus the abstract noun suffix -i. Together, it means the act of showing skill.

Question 2

How does the prefix bi- work in bi-naqs (بی‌نقص), and can I use it to make my own adjectives?

Accepted Answer

Yes, bi- means without and is highly productive in Farsi. You can attach it to almost any noun to create an adjective. Here, it attaches to the noun naqs (defect) to mean flawless. Other common examples are bi-masraf (useless) or bi-dalil (without reason).

Question 3

I thought engar (انگار), meaning as if, triggers the subjunctive mood. Why is nadasht (نداشت) in the simple past indicative here?

Accepted Answer

You will often see engar with the subjunctive for present hypotheticals or guesses. However, when describing a past situation that genuinely appeared a certain way to the speaker, Farsi speakers frequently use the past indicative. Here, the simple past nadasht emphasizes that his lack of fear was a firmly observed reality during the performance.

Question 4

Why is there an -i suffix on tars in the phrase hich tarsi nadasht (هیچ ترسی نداشت)?

Accepted Answer

When hich (no/any) is used with a countable or abstract noun in a negative sentence to mean not any or no, the noun requires the indefinite suffix -i. So hich tars becomes hich tarsi (any fear), paired with the negative verb nadasht to mean he had no fear.

هنرنمایی او بی‌نقص بود؛ انگار هیچ ترسی نداشت.

Breakdown of هنرنمایی او بی‌نقص بود؛ انگار هیچ ترسی نداشت.

Questions & Answers about هنرنمایی او بی‌نقص بود؛ انگار هیچ ترسی نداشت.

Learn هنرنمایی او بی‌نقص بود؛ انگار هیچ ترسی نداشت and more in Farsi