Breakdown of از آنجا که شواهدی حاکی از اینکه طوفان ویرانگر است پیدا شد، ما پروازها را لغو کردیم.
است
is
ما
we
آنجاânjâ
there
ازaz
from
Questions & Answers about از آنجا که شواهدی حاکی از اینکه طوفان ویرانگر است پیدا شد، ما پروازها را لغو کردیم.
How does hâki az in ke work grammatically here, and could I use mabnâ bar in ke instead?
Hâki az in ke (indicating that) acts as an adjective phrase describing shavâhedi (evidence). It introduces the content of what the evidence shows. You could absolutely swap it with mabnâ bar in ke (based on the fact that / to the effect that) in this sentence without changing the core meaning. However, hâki az specifically pairs very naturally with words like "evidence," "reports," or "signs" to mean "pointing to."
Why is there an i at the end of shavâhedi, and why is its verb (peydâ shod) placed so far away from it?
The i in shavâhedi is the indefinite suffix, meaning "some evidence." The verb peydâ shod (was found) gets pushed to the end of the first clause because Farsi verbs typically go at the end. The entire descriptive phrase hâki az in ke tufân virângar ast (indicating that the storm is destructive) is attached directly to the subject (shavâhedi), so the verb must wait until this whole descriptive block is finished.
I usually translate az ânjâ ke literally as "from where that". How does it mean "since" here?
While it literally translates to "from that place that," in a figurative and logical sense it sets the starting point or foundation of a deduction. It is a formal and very common conjunction meaning "since," "given that," or "because." It operates similarly to chon (because), but belongs to a slightly more elevated register commonly seen in news and literature.
How is the word virângar (destructive) constructed?