Breakdown of خیابان تاریک بود و نزدیک بود که یک عابر پیاده را زیر بگیرم.
و
and
بودنbudan
to be
یکyek
one / a, an
خیابانkhiâbân
street
راrâ
definite direct object marker
تاریکtârik
dark
عابر'âber
pedestrian
پیادهpiyâde
on foot
نزدیک بود کهnazdik bud ke
almost / it was close that
زیر گرفتنzir gereftan
to run over (with a vehicle)
Questions & Answers about خیابان تاریک بود و نزدیک بود که یک عابر پیاده را زیر بگیرم.
Why is the verb زیر بگیرم in the present subjunctive if the sentence is about something that almost happened in the past?
The phrase نزدیک بود که (it was close that) establishes the past timeframe. However, the action that almost happened is viewed as a hypothetical or potential event. Farsi requires the present subjunctive for these dependent, unrealized actions, regardless of the main verb's tense.
What is the infinitive for 'to run over' used here, and what does it literally mean?
The infinitive is زیر گرفتن (zir gereftan). Literally, it translates to 'to take under'. It is the standard compound verb used for running someone or something over with a vehicle.
Why is the direct object marker را used after یک عابر پیاده (a pedestrian)? Doesn't یک make it indefinite?
While را typically marks definite objects, you will often see یک ... را when referring to a specific but unnamed instance of something (meaning 'a certain pedestrian'). Here, it also serves to clearly highlight the pedestrian as the direct receiver of the action.
Can I drop the word که in the phrase نزدیک بود که?
Yes, in conversational Farsi, the conjunction که (that) is frequently omitted. You will very often hear نزدیک بود یک عابر پیاده را زیر بگیرم without changing the meaning at all.
Learn خیابان تاریک بود و نزدیک بود که یک عابر پیاده را زیر بگیرم and more in Farsi
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free