به دلیل یک مشکل، طراح داشت چراغ‌ها را عوض می‌کرد.

Questions & Answers about به دلیل یک مشکل، طراح داشت چراغ‌ها را عوض می‌کرد.

How is the past progressive "was changing" formed in this sentence?
It is formed by combining the past tense of داشتن (to have) as an auxiliary verb, with the past continuous form of the main verb. Since the subject is the designer (he/she), we use داشت alongside the main verb عوض می‌کرد.
Why is داشت placed right after طراح instead of next to the main verb?
In Farsi, the auxiliary داشتن usually comes right after the subject (طراح) to signal that a continuous action is happening. The rest of the sentence, including the direct object (چراغ‌ها را), goes in the middle, and the main verb (عوض می‌کرد) stays at the very end.
Why does the می prefix come in the middle of عوض می‌کرد?
The verb عوض کردن (to change) is a compound verb made of the word عوض and the verb کردن (to do). In Farsi compound verbs, prefixes like می attach only to the actual verb part, which is why it becomes عوض می‌کرد.
How does the phrase به دلیل connect to یک مشکل to mean "due to a problem"?
به دلیل means "due to" or literally "to the reason". To link it to the following noun phrase یک مشکل (a problem), it requires an Ezafe (an invisible "e" sound). When spoken, it becomes "be dalil-e yek moshkel".
The English translation says "the lights", but there is no word for "the" in the Farsi sentence. How do we know it is definite?
The word را immediately following چراغ‌ها (lights) marks it as a specific, definite direct object. This tells you the designer was changing "the lights" rather than just "some lights" in general.

Learn به دلیل یک مشکل، طراح داشت چراغ‌ها را عوض می‌کرد and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free