زمان جلسه هنوز نامشخص است.

Questions & Answers about زمان جلسه هنوز نامشخص است.

How does the prefix nâ- change the meaning of moshakhas in this sentence?
The prefix nâ- is used to make an adjective negative, similar to the English prefixes 'un-' or 'in-'. Here, moshakhas means specific, determined, or clear. Adding nâ- creates nâmoshakhas, which means unspecified or unclear.
Why don't we see a word for 'of' between 'time' and 'the meeting'?
Persian uses the ezâfe structure to show possession or connection. Instead of a separate word for 'of', you link the words by adding an '-e' sound to the end of the first word. So, zamân and jalese become zamân-e jalese (the time of the meeting).
Why is the adverb hanuz placed before the adjective nâmoshakhas?
In Persian, adverbs of time like hanuz (still) generally come before the adjective or verb they modify. The standard structure here is Subject (zamân-e jalese) + Adverb (hanuz) + Adjective (nâmoshakhas) + Verb (ast).
Does the word hanuz always mean 'still'?
In a positive sentence like this one, hanuz translates to 'still'. However, it is a very versatile word: if the sentence had a negative verb, like nist instead of ast, hanuz would translate to 'yet'.
Could I use a negative verb instead of the negative adjective nâmoshakhas?
Yes, you could say zamân-e jalese hanuz moshakhas nist (the time of the meeting is not clear yet). Using the nâ- prefix with a positive verb (nâmoshakhas ast) puts a slightly more formal emphasis on the 'unspecified' state as an ongoing condition, but both are very natural.

Learn زمان جلسه هنوز نامشخص است and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free