Nadat we waren omgekeerd, stelden we ons plan bij.

Questions & Answers about Nadat we waren omgekeerd, stelden we ons plan bij.

Why do we use waren omgekeerd (past perfect) here instead of the simple past?
The conjunction nadat strictly requires the action in its clause to be fully completed before the main clause happens. Since the main clause (stelden we ons plan bij) is already in the simple past, the nadat clause must shift one step further back in time, requiring the past perfect (waren omgekeerd).
Why does the first clause use waren instead of hadden for 'had'?
The verb omkeren (to turn around) describes a physical change of direction or state. Like many verbs of motion or transformation, it forms its perfect tenses with zijn rather than hebben. Therefore, 'we had turned around' translates to we waren omgekeerd.
Why is the word order stelden we rather than we stelden in the second half?
The entire nadat subordinate clause acts as the first element of the main sentence. Because Dutch uses verb-second (V2) word order in main clauses, the main verb (stelden) must immediately follow the comma, pushing the subject (we) behind it.
How do the separable verbs omkeren and bijstellen behave differently in this sentence?
In the subordinate clause, the past participle of omkeren merges its prefix and the ge- affix into one word (omgekeerd). However, in the main clause, bijstellen is conjugated in the simple past (stelden). Because it is a main clause, the separable prefix bij detaches and moves to the very end of the sentence.

Learn Nadat we waren omgekeerd, stelden we ons plan bij and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free