Breakdown of De beperkingen die in dit contract vermeld, zijn uitdrukkelijk bindend.
zijn
to be
in
in
dit
this (neuter)
het contract
the contract
Questions & Answers about De beperkingen die in dit contract vermeld, zijn uitdrukkelijk bindend.
Why is there no verb like zijn or worden at the end of the relative clause die in dit contract vermeld?
This is an example of auxiliary omission. In highly formal or legal written Dutch, the auxiliary verb (such as zijn or worden) can be dropped from a relative clause that ends in a past participle. The complete clause would normally be die in dit contract vermeld zijn.
What is the function of the comma right after vermeld?
The comma indicates the end of the relative clause and separates it from the main verb of the sentence, zijn. Because the auxiliary verb was omitted right before the comma, this punctuation is crucial to help the reader see where the main clause resumes.
Could I write vermelde instead of vermeld here?
No, because vermeld is functioning as a past participle inside the relative clause, not as an inflected adjective. You would only add the -e ending if you placed it directly before the noun as an adjective, like in the phrase de in dit contract vermelde beperkingen.
How does uitdrukkelijk add to the meaning of the sentence?
The word uitdrukkelijk translates to explicitly or expressly. It is often used in formal and legal contexts to emphasize that a condition or rule is stated clearly and directly, leaving no room for misinterpretation.