Breakdown of Volgens de krantenkop had de storm een complete puinhoop achtergelaten.
een
a/an
hebben
to have
de storm
the storm
volgens
according to
achterlaten
to leave behind
compleet
complete / completely (entire, total)
de krantenkop
the headline
de puinhoop
the mess (shambles, ruin)
Questions & Answers about Volgens de krantenkop had de storm een complete puinhoop achtergelaten.
Why is it complete with an -e here, instead of just compleet?
In this sentence, complete is an adjective modifying the noun puinhoop. Because puinhoop is a de-word (from de hoop), it takes the -e ending after the indefinite article een. If it were acting as an adverb of degree modifying another adjective (like een compleet verwoeste stad for a completely destroyed city), it would drop the -e.
Why is the verb had placed before the subject de storm?
The sentence starts with the prepositional phrase Volgens de krantenkop (According to the headline). Putting this at the front of the sentence triggers inversion, meaning the finite verb had must take the second position, right before the subject de storm.
What makes up the word puinhoop?
It is a compound of puin (rubble, debris) and hoop (pile, heap). So a puinhoop is literally a pile of rubble, which is widely used figuratively to mean a massive mess or disaster.
Why is achtergelaten all the way at the end of the sentence?
This sentence uses the past perfect tense. The auxiliary verb had takes the second position, which pushes the past participle achtergelaten (from the separable verb achterlaten, meaning to leave behind) to the very end of the clause.
Learn Volgens de krantenkop had de storm een complete puinhoop achtergelaten and more in Dutch
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free