Breakdown of Ik pauzeer de documentaire, omdat de ondertiteling onduidelijk is.
ik
I
zijn
to be
omdat
because (subordinating)
onduidelijk
unclear
Questions & Answers about Ik pauzeer de documentaire, omdat de ondertiteling onduidelijk is.
How could you rewrite the second half of this sentence to use wat ... betreft (as for...) from this lesson?
If you wanted to make the subtitles the main topic of a new sentence, you could say: Wat de ondertiteling betreft, is deze onduidelijk. Notice how the entire phrase wat de ondertiteling betreft acts as the first block in the sentence, which forces the verb is into the second position (V2 inversion).
The English translation says "subtitles" (plural), so why is ondertiteling singular?
In Dutch, ondertiteling usually refers to subtitling as a collective whole or a system, making it a singular uncountable noun. While the literal plural ondertitels exists (referring to the individual lines of text on the screen), ondertiteling is the standard, natural term you will use when talking about movies and documentaries.
Why is the verb is pushed to the very end of the sentence?
Because omdat (because) is a subordinating conjunction. It introduces a subordinate clause, which always pushes the conjugated verb to the end. As a quick refresher, if you used want (which also means because), the word order would remain normal: ..., want de ondertiteling is onduidelijk.
Is the comma before omdat strictly necessary?