Learn Dutch: Gisteren ben ik in de stad wezen winkelen. - Yesterday I went shopping in the city.

When you want to say you went somewhere to do an activity and have already returned, Dutch uses zijn + wezen + the infinitive of the action verb. If you just wanted to say you were in the city without mentioning the activity, you would use the normal past participle: Ik ben in de stad geweest. But because you add the activity winkelen, geweest changes into the infinitive wezen.

The English translation says 'went shopping', but the Dutch sentence uses ben. Why?

In English, we often use the simple past 'went' to describe a completed outing. Dutch uses a perfect tense construction that literally translates to 'I am been shopping' (ben ... wezen winkelen). This specifically implies that the shopping trip is completely finished and you have returned from the city.

Why is it ben ik instead of ik ben?

This is a quick reminder of the verb-second rule. Because the sentence starts with the time word Gisteren, that takes up the first position. The conjugated verb ben must stay in the second position, so the subject ik is pushed to the third position, swapping places with the verb.

Does the order of the verbs at the end matter? Could I say winkelen wezen?