Questions & Answers about Zij stemt in met het contract, mits u sneller levert.
How does the word mits affect the word order here?
Mits (provided that) is a subordinating conjunction. This means it introduces a subclause, pushing the conjugated verb to the end of that clause. That is why the verb levert is at the very end, rather than right after u.
Why is the verb stemt in split up?
The full verb is instemmen (to agree). Because it is a separable verb used in a main clause, the core verb (stemt) takes the normal second position, and the separable prefix (in) is pushed to the end of that clause, right before the comma.
Why does the Dutch sentence use met (with) instead of a word for "to"?
The verb instemmen takes a fixed preposition: met. While in English you "agree to" a contract, in Dutch you always "agree with" (instemmen met) it.
Could I just use als instead of mits?
You could, but mits is much stronger. While als simply means "if", mits specifically means "provided that" or "only on the condition that". It emphasizes that faster delivery is a strict requirement for her agreement.
Is mits a common word in everyday spoken Dutch?