Doordat de woestijn groeit, worden veel dieren bedreigd.

Questions & Answers about Doordat de woestijn groeit, worden veel dieren bedreigd.

What is the difference between using doordat and omdat in this sentence?
Both translate to "because", but doordat is used for an objective cause (one thing causes another physically or logically, without human intention). The desert growing is a natural process that directly causes the threat to the animals. Omdat is usually used for a reason or motivation. While Dutch speakers often just use omdat in daily speech, doordat is the most precise choice for a non-human cause like this.
Why is the main verb worden placed right after the comma?
This happens because of inversion. The entire first clause (Doordat de woestijn groeit) takes up the first slot of the main sentence. To keep the main verb in the second position, worden has to come right after the comma, swapping places with the subject veel dieren.
Why does this sentence use worden ... bedreigd instead of zijn ... bedreigd?
This is the present tense passive voice. Using worden shows that the action is happening right now: the animals are currently being threatened. If you used zijn (zijn bedreigd), it would be the present perfect passive, meaning the action was already finished (they have been threatened).
Since doordat is a subordinating conjunction, shouldn't it send the verb to the end of its clause?
It actually does! In the clause doordat de woestijn groeit, the verb groeit is at the very end. It just looks like normal word order because there are no other words (like time or place) in that part of the sentence to go between the subject and the verb.

Learn Doordat de woestijn groeit, worden veel dieren bedreigd and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free