Breakdown of Eftersom filmen var meget tankevækkende, diskuterede vi den længe.
være
to be
den
it (common)
vi
we
filmen
the film
Questions & Answers about Eftersom filmen var meget tankevækkende, diskuterede vi den længe.
How is the word tankevækkende constructed in this sentence?
It is a present participle with an incorporated object. It combines the noun tanke (thought) with vækkende, the present participle of the verb at vække (to wake or arouse). In Danish, the object goes directly before the participle to form a single compound adjective, similar to the English structure thought-provoking.
Does tankevækkende change its ending depending on the noun it describes?
No. Although it acts as an adjective here, present participles ending in -ende never change their form to match gender or number. It remains exactly the same whether it describes an en word, an et word, or a plural noun.
What is the difference between using eftersom and fordi here?
While both mean because or since, eftersom is often used when the reason is treated as a logical premise or something already understood by the listener, much like since or seeing as in English. fordi is more common when introducing a completely new reason.
Why is the word order diskuterede vi instead of vi diskuterede?
This is a classic example of the V2 (verb-second) rule. The entire subordinate clause starting with Eftersom occupies the first position in the sentence. To keep the main verb in the second position, diskuterede must come right after the comma, swapping places with the subject vi.