Question 1

Why do we use the plain infinitive belirlemek before şartıyla instead of a possessive verbal noun like belirlememiz?

Accepted Answer

We use the plain infinitive (-mAk) because the subject doing the conditional action (establishing) is the same as the subject of the main verb (we accept). If we were saying "on the condition that he establishes a new principle," we would need the verbal noun with a possessive suffix: belirlemesi şartıyla.

Question 2

Can you break down the suffixes on the word otoritesini?

Accepted Answer

The root is the loanword otorite (authority). The -si is the 3rd-person possessive suffix, linking it to müdürün (the manager's). The -n- is a buffer consonant used after a possessive suffix, and the final -i is the accusative case marker because the whole phrase is the direct object of kabul ediyoruz.

Question 3

What exactly is the -ıyla ending in şartıyla?

Accepted Answer

It is a combination of two suffixes attached to şart (condition). The -ı is a 3rd-person possessive suffix, linking the condition to the preceding action (literally "the condition of establishing"). The -(y)la is the instrumental case (with/by). So, it literally translates to "with its condition."

Question 4

Could I use koşuluyla instead of şartıyla in this sentence?

Accepted Answer

Yes, absolutely. Şart is of Arabic origin, while koşul is its Turkish-origin equivalent. They are entirely interchangeable in this grammar structure, so belirlemek koşuluyla means exactly the same thing.

Yeni bir prensip belirlemek şartıyla müdürün otoritesini kabul ediyoruz.

Breakdown of Yeni bir prensip belirlemek şartıyla müdürün otoritesini kabul ediyoruz.

Questions & Answers about Yeni bir prensip belirlemek şartıyla müdürün otoritesini kabul ediyoruz.

Learn Yeni bir prensip belirlemek şartıyla müdürün otoritesini kabul ediyoruz and more in Turkish