Hain korkuyordu, yine de ölmek pahasına savaştı.

Questions & Answers about Hain korkuyordu, yine de ölmek pahasına savaştı.

Why do we use the plain infinitive ölmek before pahasına instead of a possessive verbal noun like ölmenin?
The phrase pahasına (at the cost of) pairs directly with the standard -mAk infinitive when the person taking the risk is the same as the subject of the main action. Since the traitor is the one both dying and fighting, we just use the bare infinitive ölmek.
What is the exact suffix breakdown of the word pahasına?
The root is the noun paha, meaning "price" or "value" (you might recognize it from pahalı, meaning expensive). It takes the 3rd-person possessive suffix -sı to link it to the dying ("the price of dying"), followed by the buffer letter -n- and the dative suffix -a to mean "at the price/cost of".
Could I just use ama (but) instead of yine de (yet / nevertheless) here?
You could, but yine de is a much better fit for this context. It creates a stronger contrast, specifically emphasizing that the second action (savaştı) happened in spite of the condition established in the first clause (korkuyordu).
Why does the sentence mix the past continuous (korkuyordu) with the simple past (savaştı)?
This combination is commonly used to set a scene. Korkuyordu (was afraid / was fearing) establishes an ongoing background state or emotion. Savaştı (fought) acts as the definite, concrete action that occurred against that backdrop.

Learn Hain korkuyordu, yine de ölmek pahasına savaştı and more in Turkish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free