Bu reform, işçilere refah güvencesi veriyor.
This reform gives a prosperity guarantee to the workers.
Questions & Answers about Bu reform, işçilere refah güvencesi veriyor.
Why is it güvencesi and not just güvence?
In Turkish, when you combine two nouns to create a specific concept, the second noun takes a possessive suffix. Here, refah (prosperity) and güvence (guarantee) combine to mean "prosperity guarantee". Because güvence ends in a vowel, it takes the third-person possessive suffix -si.
Why does işçiler have the -e suffix added to it?
The word işçilere translates to "to the workers." The verb vermek (to give) requires the dative case for the recipient of the action. So, you take işçi (worker), add the plural -ler, and finally add the dative suffix -e to show who is receiving the guarantee.
Since a reform's guarantee is a fact, why use the present continuous veriyor instead of the broad tense (aorist) verir?
While English often uses the simple present ("gives") for stating facts, Turkish frequently uses the present continuous (-iyor) for situations that are currently ongoing or the active result of a recent event. Using verir would sound more like a timeless, theoretical rule (e.g., "reforms in general give guarantees"), whereas veriyor emphasizes what this specific reform is actively doing in the real world right now.
Is güvence related to the word for "trust" (güven)?