Breakdown of Cadılar ve cinler o karanlık mağarada saklanacakmış.
o
that / he / she / it
ve
and
karanlık
dark
mağara
cave
Questions & Answers about Cadılar ve cinler o karanlık mağarada saklanacakmış.
Why is the verb saklanacakmış instead of just saklanacak?
This is the inferential future tense in action! The -mış suffix adds a "hearsay" or "apparently" meaning to the future tense (-acak). By saying saklanacakmış, the speaker is conveying "I heard that..." or "Apparently, they will hide." If they just used saklanacak, it would be a direct statement of fact: "They will hide."
What is the difference between the verb root here, saklan-, and sakla-?
Saklamak means "to hide [something else]". By adding the -n suffix, it becomes the reflexive verb saklanmak, which means "to hide oneself". Here, the witches and jinns are hiding themselves, so we use saklanmak.
The subject is plural (Cadılar ve cinler), so why doesn't the verb have a plural suffix like saklanacaklarmış?
In Turkish, if a plural subject is non-human, the verb typically stays in the singular form. Even though witches and jinns are sentient mythical beings, it's grammatically standard and very common to use the singular verb saklanacakmış for them.
What exactly are cinler? Are they just ghosts?