Avukat adaletsiz bir dava açmamalıydı.

Breakdown of Avukat adaletsiz bir dava açmamalıydı.

bir
a / an
avukat
lawyer
açmak
to open
dava
case / lawsuit
adaletsiz
unfair / unjust

Questions & Answers about Avukat adaletsiz bir dava açmamalıydı.

How do we build the 'should not have' meaning in açmamalıydı?
It combines the verb stem (to open), the negative suffix -ma, the obligation suffix -malı (should), the buffer letter -y-, and the past tense suffix -dı. Together, -mamalıydı expresses an unfulfilled past obligation, meaning 'should not have done it' (implying the lawyer actually did it).
Why is the verb açmak (to open) used here for filing a lawsuit?
In Turkish, the fixed expression for 'to file a lawsuit' or 'to sue' is dava açmak (literally, to open a lawsuit). You cannot translate 'to file' literally here.
Why is the word order adaletsiz bir dava instead of bir adaletsiz dava?
When describing a noun with both an adjective and the indefinite article bir, the adjective almost always comes first in Turkish. The standard pattern is Adjective + bir + Noun.
How is the adjective adaletsiz formed?
It is made from the noun adalet (justice) and the suffix -siz (without or -less). It literally means 'without justice' or 'unfair'.

Learn Avukat adaletsiz bir dava açmamalıydı and more in Turkish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free