Breakdown of Om planen skulle misslyckas, tar kumpanen flyktbilen.
ta
to take
planen
the plan
om
if, whether
skulle
would
misslyckas
to fail
flyktbilen
the getaway car
kumpanen
the accomplice
Questions & Answers about Om planen skulle misslyckas, tar kumpanen flyktbilen.
Why use skulle misslyckas instead of just misslyckas?
Adding skulle to the bare infinitive makes the condition more tentative or hypothetical. While om planen misslyckas simply means 'if the plan fails,' om planen skulle misslyckas emphasizes that failure is a remote possibility, translating perfectly to 'if the plan were to fail' or 'if the plan should fail.'
Why does the main clause use the present tense (tar) instead of a conditional like skulle ta?
Using the present tense tar (takes) after a hypothetical 'if' clause makes the consequence sound like a fixed protocol or a pre-agreed rule. If the speaker had used skulle ta (would take), it would sound more like a general prediction rather than a concrete backup plan.
Is misslyckas a passive verb here because of the -s at the end?
No, it has a completely active meaning ('to fail'). It belongs to a group of words called deponent verbs, which always end in -s but are active in meaning. You have likely encountered this before with common verbs like hoppas (to hope), minnas (to remember), and kännas (to feel).
Why is the word order tar kumpanen instead of kumpanen tar?
This is a classic example of the Swedish V2 (verb-second) rule. The entire subordinate clause (Om planen skulle misslyckas) acts as the first block of information in the sentence. Therefore, the main clause's verb (tar) must take the second position, pushing the subject (kumpanen) to the third spot.
Learn Om planen skulle misslyckas, tar kumpanen flyktbilen and more in Swedish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free