Modal verbs are the small set of helper verbs that let you talk about ability, permission, obligation, intention, and possibility — Swedish kan, vill, ska, måste, får, bör, lär, må. The good news for an English speaker is that they behave almost exactly like English modals in one crucial way (they take a bare infinitive of the main verb), and like all Swedish verbs they never change for person. The catch is that a few of them carry several unrelated meanings, so the difficulty is rarely the grammar — it is knowing which sense is in play. This page lays out the whole set and its shared rules; the detail pages drill each verb.
The one rule that ties them all together: bare infinitive, no att
A Swedish modal is followed directly by the bare infinitive of the main verb — the dictionary form with no att in front of it. This is the single most important fact on the page, and it matches English perfectly: you say I can swim, not I can to swim, and Swedish says Jag kan simma, not Jag kan att simma.
Jag kan simma.
I can swim. kan + simma — bare infinitive, no 'att'. Exactly like English 'can swim'.
Du måste gå nu.
You must go now. måste + gå — again no 'att' between the modal and the main verb.
Vi ska äta klockan sju.
We're going to eat at seven. ska + äta — the bare infinitive follows directly.
This is worth stressing because most other Swedish verbs that take a following verb do require att: Jag försöker *att simma ("I'm trying to swim"), Jag hoppas **att komma ("I hope to come"). The modals are precisely the verbs that drop it. So the dividing line you must internalise is: **modal → bare infinitive; ordinary verb + following verb → usually *att + infinitive.
They never agree for person — and they're irregular in the present
Swedish verbs already don't conjugate for person (it's jag talar, du talar, han talar). The modals keep that property and add one twist: their present-tense forms are irregular and invariable. You don't build kan from a regular ending — you simply memorise it, and then it is the same for every subject.
| Infinitive | Present | Core meaning |
|---|---|---|
| kunna | kan | can, be able to; know how / know a language |
| vilja | vill | want to |
| skola | ska (also skall, formal) | shall, will, be going to; be supposed to |
| — | måste | must, have to |
| få | får | may, be allowed to; get to; have to |
| böra | bör | ought to, should |
| — | lär | is said to, apparently (reportive) |
| må | må | may (wish); feel (health) |
Notice that the present form is the same for all subjects — there is no -s, no plural form, nothing:
Jag kan, du kan, hon kan, vi kan, de kan.
I can, you can, she can, we can, they can. One single form — kan — for every subject. No agreement at all.
Han vill äta men de vill sova.
He wants to eat but they want to sleep. 'vill' is identical for 'han' and 'de'.
The practical upshot is huge: once you know the present form of a modal, you can build any modal sentence with any subject. There is no grid of persons to drill, only the single irregular present to memorise.
måste (and lär) have no everyday infinitive
Two of these are defective — they lack the full set of forms most verbs have. måste is the headline case: in everyday Swedish it has no separate infinitive and no distinct past. The form måste does duty for the present, and for the past most speakers reach for var tvungen att ("was forced/obliged to") or simply leave måste unchanged in context.
Jag måste gå.
I must go / I have to go. Present.
Igår var jag tvungen att jobba sent.
Yesterday I had to work late. The past of 'måste' is normally supplied by 'var tvungen att' — note that 'att' DOES appear here, because 'tvungen' is an adjective, not a modal.
The reportive lär ("is said to, apparently") is also defective and quite literary — Han lär vara mycket rik ("He's said to be very rich"). You should recognise it, but you won't need to produce it at A2.
Several modals are heavily polysemous — meaning, not form, is the work
The grammar of these verbs is easy; the semantics are where learners actually struggle. Three modals in particular each cover a fan of English meanings:
- få is the worst offender: Får jag komma in? ("May I come in?", permission), Vi fick se filmen ("We got to see the film", opportunity), Du får vänta lite ("You'll have to wait a bit", mild obligation) — plus a non-modal life as the main verb "get/receive": Jag fick ett brev ("I got a letter").
- ska spans intention/future (Jag ska resa, "I'm going to travel"), obligation/instruction (Du ska vara här klockan åtta, "You're to be here at eight"), and reported intention.
- må ranges from a literary wish (Må de leva länge!, "May they live long!") to the wholly everyday "feel" of health (Hur mår du?, "How are you?").
Får jag fråga något?
May I ask something? 'få' = permission here.
Du får städa ditt rum innan vi går.
You'll have to tidy your room before we leave. Same verb 'få', but now mild obligation, not permission.
So when you meet one of these, the question is never "what is the form?" — it is invariant — but "which of its meanings fits here?" The dedicated pages walk through each verb's senses with examples.
Where each verb is drilled
- Ability and knowing: kunna.
- Wanting (and the polite skulle vilja): vilja.
- Necessity and its tricky negation: måste, behöva, tvungen.
- Permission, "get to", and prohibition: få.
- The deontic scale (may / need not / must) across modals: Permission and Obligation.
Common Mistakes
❌ Jag kan att simma.
Incorrect — modals take the BARE infinitive. Delete 'att'.
✅ Jag kan simma.
I can swim.
❌ Hon vill att resa till Spanien.
Incorrect — after the modal 'vill', no 'att' before the main verb.
✅ Hon vill resa till Spanien.
She wants to travel to Spain.
❌ Han kanns / de villar (adding endings for person/plural)
Incorrect — modals are invariable. There is no '-s' or '-ar' for person or number.
✅ Han kan / de vill
he can / they want — one present form for every subject.
❌ Jag måste att gå.
Incorrect — 'måste' is a modal too; no 'att' after it.
✅ Jag måste gå.
I have to go.
❌ Vi ska att äta snart.
Incorrect — 'ska' takes the bare infinitive.
✅ Vi ska äta snart.
We're going to eat soon.
Key Takeaways
- Swedish modals — kan, vill, ska, måste, får, bör, lär, må — all take a bare infinitive with no att (Jag kan simma), exactly like English modals.
- Ordinary verbs that take a following verb usually do need att (Jag försöker att simma). The modals are the verbs that drop it — that's the dividing line.
- Modal present forms are irregular and invariable: one form per modal, identical for every subject. Learn the present and you can build any modal sentence.
- måste and lär are defective — no everyday infinitive; the past of måste is normally var tvungen att.
- The hard part is meaning, not form: få, ska, and må each carry several senses. Read the per-verb pages for the distinctions.
Now practice Swedish
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Swedish→Related Topics
- kunna (can, be able to, know how)A2 — kunna (kan / kunde / kunnat) is Swedish 'can' — but it stretches further than English 'can'. It covers ability (Jag kan simma), possibility (Det kan regna), and — the part English splits off as a different verb — learned knowledge and skills, including languages: Jag kan svenska means 'I know Swedish', with no following verb at all. This page maps all three senses and warns you off the classic veta/kunna confusion.
- vilja (want) and the Conditional skulle viljaA2 — vilja (vill / ville / velat) is 'want'. To want to DO something it's vilja + bare infinitive (Jag vill resa); to want a THING it's vill HA + noun (Jag vill ha kaffe) — the 'ha' is obligatory and dropping it is the classic English-speaker error. For polite requests, swap in the conditional skulle vilja, 'would like' (Jag skulle vilja boka ett bord). This page drills all three.
- måste, behöva, tvungen (must, need to)A2 — Necessity in Swedish: måste (invariable, no real infinitive) and behöva (behöver / behövde / behövt). The trap is the negation. 'You don't have to' is NOT du måste inte — that means 'you must NOT'. The correct way to lift an obligation is du behöver inte. This must/need-not asymmetry is the single most botched modal-negation fact in Swedish, and this page drills it.
- få (may, get to, have to)A2 — få (får / fick / fått) is the most polysemous verb in Swedish. As a modal it means permission (Får jag komma in? 'May I?'), opportunity (Vi fick se filmen 'we got to see it'), and mild obligation (Du får vänta 'you'll have to wait'); as a main verb it means 'get / receive' (Jag fick ett brev). And få inte means 'may not / must not' — prohibition — making it the partner of behöver inte ('need not') on a three-way deontic scale: får inte / behöver inte / måste.
- Permission, Obligation, and ProhibitionB1 — One decision map for the deontic modals — must, should, may, can, needn't, mustn't. The English speaker's real trap is the negatives: 'mustn't' is får inte (not måste inte), and 'needn't' is behöver inte. This page lays the positive and negative modals side by side so the cross-mapping is impossible to miss.