Questions & Answers about W nocy zerwało nam dach z powodu huraganu.
Why is the verb zerwało in the neuter form if the hurricane (huragan) is a masculine noun?
This uses the impersonal neuter construction for forces of nature. The sentence translates literally to 'it tore the roof off to us'. The hurricane is just the reason (z powodu), not the grammatical subject. If you wanted to make the hurricane the active subject, you would drop z powodu and use the masculine verb: huragan zerwał nam dach.
Why does the sentence use the Dative pronoun nam instead of the possessive nasz for 'our roof'?
In Polish, when an action affects your body parts, clothing, or close personal property like a house, it is much more natural to use a Dative pronoun to show who experienced the event. Saying 'it tore the roof off to us' (zerwało nam dach) sounds much more natural to a Polish ear than using the direct possessive translation (zerwało nasz dach).
Could I say przez huragan instead of z powodu huraganu?
Yes, they are mostly interchangeable here. Z powodu requires the Genitive case (huraganu) and states the objective cause or reason. Przez takes the Accusative case (huragan) and is also very common in everyday speech, though it sometimes places a slightly stronger sense of direct blame on the hurricane.
What case is dach in this sentence?