Breakdown of Quell'uomo era un bugiardaccio e un cattivaccio.
essere
to be
un
a / an (masculine)
l'uomo
the man (m)
e
and
quello
that
bugiardaccio
lying / terrible liar
cattivaccio
nasty / really mean
Questions & Answers about Quell'uomo era un bugiardaccio e un cattivaccio.
How does the suffix -accio change the meaning of bugiardo here?
The suffix -accio is a pejorative, meaning it adds a negative, ugly, or despicable quality to the base word. While bugiardo already means liar, adding -accio to make bugiardaccio emphasizes that he is a habitual, malicious, or truly terrible liar.
Is cattivaccio an adjective or a noun in this sentence?
It functions as a noun here. Although cattivo is usually an adjective meaning bad, Italian frequently allows adjectives to be used as nouns. By adding the indefinite article un and the pejorative suffix -accio, it becomes un cattivaccio, meaning a nasty guy or a really bad person.
Why is it Quell'uomo rather than Quello uomo?
The demonstrative adjective quello follows the exact same rules as the definite article. Since uomo begins with a vowel and takes the article l' (l'uomo), quello drops its final -o and takes an apostrophe to match, becoming quell'.
Why use the imperfetto (era) instead of the passato prossimo (è stato)?
The imperfetto is used here because it describes an ongoing state or characteristic in the past. We are describing what this man's personality was like in general, rather than referring to a specific, completed event or a change in state.
Learn Quell'uomo era un bugiardaccio e un cattivaccio and more in Italian
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free