ELONIO
Log inSign up

Il giudice ha dichiarato che la testimonianza era stata falsa.

Il giudice ha dichiarato che la testimonianza era stata falsa.
The judge declared that the testimony had been false.
From Lesson 214:Past reported speech (trapassato prossimo)·Italian

Questions & Answers about Il giudice ha dichiarato che la testimonianza era stata falsa.

Why do we use the trapassato prossimo (era stata) here instead of the passato prossimo (è stata)?
This is tense backshifting in indirect speech. Because the main verb (ha dichiarato) is in the past, the reported speech must take a step further back into the past. If the original fact was in the passato prossimo (la testimonianza è stata falsa), it shifts to the trapassato prossimo (era stata falsa) to show it happened before the judge's declaration.
Why does stata end in -a instead of -o?
In compound tenses like the trapassato prossimo, when the auxiliary verb is essere (here, era), the past participle must agree with the subject in gender and number. Since la testimonianza is feminine singular, the participle becomes stata.
Does the adjective falsa also have to agree with the subject?
Yes. Just like the past participle stata, the adjective falsa must match the feminine singular subject la testimonianza. If the subject were masculine, like il documento, the sentence would end with era stato falso.
Can I use a form of avere for the auxiliary verb here, like aveva stato?
No, the verb essere (to be) always uses itself as its auxiliary verb in compound tenses. You must use the imperfect of essere (era) plus its past participle (stato). The combination aveva stato is always grammatically incorrect in Italian.

Learn Il giudice ha dichiarato che la testimonianza era stata falsa and more in Italian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free
Start learning Italian →