Question 1

This lesson is about stylistic fronting in relative clauses. How would that look if we expanded "the provision in the regulation" into a relative clause?

Accepted Answer

If you expand it to "the provision that is in the regulation" (ákvæðið sem er í reglugerðinni), you can apply stylistic fronting by pulling the prepositional phrase before the verb. It becomes ákvæðið sem í reglugerðinni er. This sounds quite formal or legal, which perfectly matches the vocabulary of this sentence!

Question 2

Why is verður að used here instead of átt að or þarft að?

Accepted Answer

Verða að is used for strict, inescapable obligations ("must" or "have to"). Eiga að (which becomes átt að for "you") is weaker, meaning "are supposed to" or "ought to". Þurfa að ("need to") is very similar to verða að and often interchangeable, but verða að carries the strongest sense of an external rule or demand—fitting for dealing with a legal regulation.

Question 3

Ákvæði already ends in a vowel. How does the definite article attach to form ákvæðið?

Accepted Answer

Ákvæði is a neuter noun. For neuter nouns that already end in -i, you don't add the full -ið suffix for the definite article, because you'd get an awkward double vowel. Instead, you simply add -ð, making it ákvæðið ("the provision") in both the nominative and accusative cases.

Question 4

Why is reglugerðinni in the dative case here?

Accepted Answer

The preposition í takes the dative case when it describes a static location or state ("in"), rather than movement or direction ("into"). Since the provision is statically located inside the regulation, í triggers the dative form of the feminine noun reglugerð. Adding the dative feminine definite article gives us í reglugerðinni.

Þú verður að lesa ákvæðið í reglugerðinni.

Breakdown of Þú verður að lesa ákvæðið í reglugerðinni.

Questions & Answers about Þú verður að lesa ákvæðið í reglugerðinni.

Learn Þú verður að lesa ákvæðið í reglugerðinni and more in Icelandic