Stjórinn var ekki með ofmetnað heldur bara ástríðu.

Questions & Answers about Stjórinn var ekki með ofmetnað heldur bara ástríðu.

How does the prefix of- create the meaning of ofmetnað here?
The base noun is metnaður, which means 'ambition' or 'pride' (usually a positive trait). The prefix of- adds the meaning of 'over-' or 'too much'. Together, ofmetnaður literally means 'over-ambition,' which translates perfectly to 'hubris' or 'arrogance'. Notice that it drops the -ur ending here because it is in the accusative case.
Why use heldur for 'but' instead of the usual word en?
Heldur is specifically used for 'but' when you are correcting a negative statement. The structure is always 'not X, but rather Y' (ekki X, heldur Y). Because the sentence establishes that the boss did not have hubris (var ekki með...), you must use heldur to introduce what he did have.
Why are both ofmetnað and ástríðu in the accusative case?
They are both the object of the preposition með (with). The sentence uses the phrase vera með (literally 'to be with') to mean 'to have'. When með means 'holding', 'carrying', or 'having', it forces the following nouns into the accusative case. The preposition applies to both nouns, even though it is only written once before the first noun.
Could I use the verb hafa instead of vera með to say 'did not have'?
It is much more natural to use vera með here. While hafa means 'to have', Icelandic strongly prefers vera með for physical possessions, illnesses, and personal traits or characteristics like ofmetnaður (hubris) and ástríða (passion).

Learn Stjórinn var ekki með ofmetnað heldur bara ástríðu and more in Icelandic

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free