Breakdown of Jag trodde först att en propp hade gått, men problemet var bara att lampan hade slocknat.
Questions & Answers about Jag trodde först att en propp hade gått, men problemet var bara att lampan hade slocknat.
What does propp mean here?
Here propp means a fuse. In everyday Swedish, especially in slightly older or non-technical language, en propp går means that a fuse blows.
So Jag trodde först att en propp hade gått means I first thought a fuse had blown.
Note that propp can mean other things in other contexts, such as a plug or stopper, but here it is clearly about electricity.
Why does Swedish say en propp hade gått? Literally it looks like a fuse had gone.
This is an idiomatic expression. Swedish often uses gå in expressions where English uses a different verb.
- En propp går = a fuse blows
- literally: a fuse goes
So you should learn gå here as part of the whole expression, not as the usual basic meaning to go.
Why is it Jag trodde först and not Jag först trodde?
In Swedish, adverbs like först often come after the finite verb in a main clause.
So:
- Jag trodde först ... = I first thought ...
This is the normal Swedish word order:
- subject + finite verb + adverb
Compare:
- Jag kommer snart. = I’m coming soon.
- Hon såg aldrig filmen. = She never saw the film.
What exactly does först mean here?
Here först means at first or initially.
So:
- Jag trodde först att ... = At first I thought that ...
Be careful: först can also mean first in a sequence, depending on context. In this sentence, it clearly means initially.
Why is there an att after trodde?
Att means that and introduces a subordinate clause.
So:
- Jag trodde först att en propp hade gått
- I first thought that a fuse had blown
In English, that is often optional:
- I thought that...
- I thought...
In Swedish, att is very common in this kind of sentence and usually sounds more natural than leaving it out.
Why do we get hade gått and hade slocknat instead of just gick and slocknade?
Because the sentence is referring to something that was believed or had happened before another moment in the past.
- Jag trodde först ... = the thinking happened in the past
- en propp hade gått = the fuse had already blown before that moment
- lampan hade slocknat = the lamp had already gone out before that moment
This is the past perfect:
- hade + supine
Examples:
- hade gått
- hade slocknat
English also uses the past perfect here:
- had blown
- had gone out
What is slocknat, and how is it different from släckt?
Slocknat comes from slockna, which means to go out or to stop burning/shining by itself.
So:
- Lampan hade slocknat = The lamp had gone out
This suggests that the light stopped shining, rather than someone actively turning it off.
Compare:
- Lampan hade slocknat = the lamp went out
- Lampan hade släckts = the lamp had been turned off / extinguished
Related verb:
- släcka = to put out / turn off something
- slockna = to go out on its own
Why is it lampan and not en lampa?
Lampan means the lamp. In this sentence, it refers to a specific lamp that both speaker and listener can identify from the situation.
So:
- lampan = the lamp
- en lampa = a lamp
Since the problem turned out to be with a particular lamp, Swedish uses the definite form lampan.
What does bara add to the sentence?
Bara means only or just.
So:
- problemet var bara att lampan hade slocknat
- the problem was just that the lamp had gone out
It softens the second part and shows that the real explanation was simple, not as serious as a blown fuse.
Why is the word order problemet var bara att ... and not problemet bara var att ...?
Because in a main clause, Swedish normally places the finite verb in the second position.
Here the finite verb is var:
- problemet = first element
- var = second element
- bara = comes after the verb
So the normal order is:
- Problemet var bara att ...
This is part of the Swedish V2 rule: the finite verb usually comes second in main clauses.
Is men used the same way as English but?
Yes, in this sentence men works just like but.
It contrasts the first idea with the real explanation:
- I thought the fuse had blown, but the problem was just that the lamp had gone out.
So men is a very straightforward conjunction here.
Could you break the whole sentence into parts?
Yes:
- Jag = I
- trodde = thought
- först = at first / initially
- att = that
- en propp = a fuse
- hade gått = had blown / literally had gone
- men = but
- problemet = the problem
- var bara = was just / was only
- att = that
- lampan = the lamp
- hade slocknat = had gone out
So the structure is:
- I first thought that X had happened, but the problem was only that Y had happened.
Is this sentence natural everyday Swedish?
Yes, it sounds natural. It is a normal conversational sentence.
A native speaker might also say something very similar like:
- Jag trodde först att en säkring hade gått, men det var bara lampan som hade slocknat.
Here säkring is a more technical/common word for fuse, while propp is also very common in everyday speech, especially in the expression proppen gick.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning SwedishMaster Swedish — from Jag trodde först att en propp hade gått, men problemet var bara att lampan hade slocknat to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions