Soy una lectora principiante, pero me encanta esta novela.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Spanish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Spanish now

Questions & Answers about Soy una lectora principiante, pero me encanta esta novela.

Why is it soy and not estoy in Soy una lectora principiante?

Spanish has two verbs for to be: ser and estar.

  • ser is used for:

    • identities, roles, and professions
    • more permanent or defining characteristics
    • classifications (what kind of thing/person something is)
  • estar is used for:

    • temporary states or conditions
    • locations
    • results of a change

In Soy una lectora principiante, the speaker is classifying herself as a kind of reader: a beginner reader. That kind of classification normally uses ser:

  • Soy estudiante. – I am a student.
  • Soy profesora. – I am a teacher.
  • Soy una lectora principiante. – I am a beginner reader.

Estar would sound wrong here: Estoy una lectora principiante is not grammatical. To express the idea of being currently in the early stages of reading, you’d phrase it differently, for example:

  • Estoy empezando a leer. – I’m starting to read.
Why do we need the article una in una lectora principiante? Could we say Soy lectora principiante?

With professions and similar nouns, Spanish often omits the indefinite article when the noun is not modified:

  • Soy profesora. – I’m a teacher.
  • Es médico. – He’s a doctor.

But when that noun is modified by an adjective or other phrase, Spanish normally uses the indefinite article:

  • Soy una profesora estricta. – I’m a strict teacher.
  • Es un médico excelente. – He’s an excellent doctor.

In una lectora principiante, lectora is modified by principiante, so the normal form is:

  • Soy una lectora principiante.

Without una (Soy lectora principiante) is not impossible, but it sounds odd or incomplete in standard modern Spanish. Native speakers very strongly prefer the version with the article in this kind of structure.

Why is it lectora and not lector? How does gender work here?

In Spanish, many nouns that refer to people change form depending on whether the person is male or female.

  • lector = male reader
  • lectora = female reader

The sentence Soy una lectora principiante is said by someone who identifies as female, so everything agrees in gender:

  • una (feminine singular article)
  • lectora (feminine form of lector)

If a man said it, he would say:

  • Soy un lector principiante.

If you don’t want to specify gender, you can sometimes use other expressions like:

  • Soy una persona que está empezando a leer novelas. – I’m a person who is starting to read novels.
What exactly is principiante? Is it an adjective or a noun, and does it change for gender or number?

Principiante can be both:

  1. A noun: el/la principiante = the beginner
  2. An adjective: lector/a principiante = beginner reader

About agreement:

  • For gender: principiante does not change. It’s the same for masculine and feminine:

    • un lector principiante (male)
    • una lectora principiante (female)
  • For number: it does change:

    • singular: principiante
    • plural: principiantes

Examples:

  • Son lectores principiantes. – They are beginner readers.
  • Somos lectoras principiantes. – We (all women) are beginner readers.
Why does principiante go after lectora instead of before it?

In Spanish, the normal word order is:

  • noun + adjective

So you usually say:

  • un coche rojo – a red car
  • una novela interesante – an interesting novel
  • una lectora principiante – a beginner reader

Some adjectives can go before the noun (especially very common ones like bueno, malo, gran, nuevo, viejo), often with a slightly more subjective or stylistic nuance. But principiante behaves like a regular descriptive adjective here, and the natural position is after the noun.

Principiante lectora would sound strange and is not the standard pattern.

Could I just say Soy principiante instead of Soy una lectora principiante?

Yes, you can.

  • Soy principiante. literally = I’m a beginner.

On its own, Soy principiante is more general: a beginner at something that’s usually understood from context (reading, driving, skiing, etc.).

Soy una lectora principiante is more specific: it tells you exactly in what you’re a beginner (in reading novels). So:

  • Soy principiante. – I’m a beginner (at this).
  • Soy una lectora principiante. – I’m a beginner reader.

Both are correct; the longer version just gives more information.

Why is it pero and not sino?

Both pero and sino can translate as but, but they’re used differently.

  • pero = but, however (adds a contrast)
  • sino = but rather, but instead (corrects or replaces a negated idea)

You use sino only after a negative (no, nunca, nada, etc.) when you want to replace the first idea:

  • No soy una lectora experta, sino una lectora principiante.
    I’m not an expert reader, but rather a beginner reader.

In your sentence there is no negation in the first clause:

  • Soy una lectora principiante, pero me encanta esta novela.

So we just have a contrast: even though I’m a beginner, I really like the novel. That’s why pero is correct here, not sino.

How does me encanta work grammatically, and why do we need me?

Encantar belongs to the same grammar pattern as gustar.

In English we say:

  • I love this novel.
    → subject: I
    → object: this novel

In Spanish with encantar:

  • Me encanta esta novela.

Grammar-wise in Spanish:

  • esta novela is the subject (the thing that “enchants”)
  • me is an indirect object pronoun meaning to me
  • encanta agrees with esta novela (3rd person singular)

Literally:

  • Esta novela me encanta. = This novel is delightful to me / enchants me.

That’s why you say:

  • Me encanta esta novela. – I love this novel.
  • Te encanta esta novela. – You love this novel.
  • Nos encantan estas novelas. – We love these novels.

Notice how encanta/encantan change depending on whether the thing loved is singular or plural, not on who loves it. The pronoun (me, te, le, nos…) changes with the person.

Why don’t we say Encanto esta novela for I love this novel?

Encanto esta novela is grammatically possible but has a different meaning:

  • yo encanto esta novelaI enchant this novel
    (as if I am casting a spell on the novel)

The usual everyday way to say I love this novel is:

  • Me encanta esta novela.

Because encantar, like gustar, is normally used in this indirect structure:

  • Me encanta el libro. – I love the book.
  • Me encantan los libros. – I love books.

Using encantar with a direct object (encantar algo/alguien) exists, but it tends to mean to enchant, to charm, and is used more in literary or special contexts, usually with people, not with things like books:

  • Su manera de hablar me encanta.
  • El mago encantó al público. – The magician enchanted the audience.
Why is it esta without an accent (not ésta) in esta novela?

Esta here is a demonstrative adjective meaning this that goes before a noun:

  • esta novela – this novel
  • esa novela – that novel
  • aquella novela – that novel (far away)

Modern standard Spanish writes these without accents when they function as adjectives.

You sometimes see ésta, ésa, aquélla with an accent when they are pronouns (standing alone: this one, that one), but the official recommendation today from the Real Academia Española is to avoid the accent unless there is real ambiguity.

In your sentence, esta clearly comes right before novela, so it’s an adjective and it should not have an accent: esta novela.

What’s the difference between esta novela, esa novela, and aquella novela?

All three mean this/that novel, but they show different degrees of distance (physical, mental, or emotional).

In Spain:

  • esta novelathis novel (close to the speaker, or the one we’re very focused on right now)
  • esa novelathat novel (a bit further away, often closer to the listener, or just not as “psychologically close”)
  • aquella novelathat novel over there (far from both speaker and listener, or distant in time / more removed in thought)

Examples:

  • Holding a book in your hand: Me encanta esta novela.
  • Pointing to a book near your friend: ¿Te gusta esa novela?
  • Talking about a novel you read years ago: Aquella novela que leí de niña me marcó mucho.

In practice, the choice can be physical, but also about how “close” you feel to the thing in the conversation.

Can I say Me encanta la novela instead of Me encanta esta novela? Is there a difference?

You can say both, but there is a nuance:

  • Me encanta esta novela.
    → Emphasises this specific novel (the one we’re talking about, maybe in your hands right now).

  • Me encanta la novela.
    Depending on context, it can mean:

    • I love the novel (the one we both already know which one it is), or
    • more generally, I love the novel as a whole (its story, style, etc.), not just at this exact moment.

If you’re physically holding or just started reading a particular book and want to stress that one, esta novela is more natural. If both people already know which novel you’re talking about (for example, you’ve already named it), la novela also works fine.