Comparamos el bloqueo temporal con la baja definitiva.

Comparamos is the 1st person plural form of comparar — so it means we compare.

A useful extra point: comparamos can also be the preterite form (we compared). In other words, this form is ambiguous by itself.

• Present: Comparamos el bloqueo temporal con la baja definitiva. = We compare...
• Preterite: Ayer comparamos el bloqueo temporal con la baja definitiva. = Yesterday we compared...

Without extra context, learners often read it as the present tense, but context is what really decides.

Spanish often drops subject pronouns because the verb ending already shows who the subject is.

• Comparamos already tells you the subject is we
• So nosotros comparamos is possible, but usually unnecessary

You would include nosotros only for emphasis, contrast, or clarity:

• Nosotros comparamos el bloqueo temporal con la baja definitiva, pero ellos comparan otra cosa.

So the version without nosotros sounds very natural.

In Spanish, comparar ... con ... is a very common pattern meaning to compare ... with ...

So:

• comparar A con B = to compare A with B

In this sentence:

• Comparamos el bloqueo temporal con la baja definitiva

Spanish can also sometimes compare two things without con, especially in other structures, but comparar X con Y is one of the most standard and natural ways to say it.

Spanish uses definite articles much more often than English does.

Here, el and la are used because the sentence is referring to specific concepts or categories:

• el bloqueo temporal
• la baja definitiva

In English, you might sometimes omit the, depending on style, but in Spanish the articles usually sound more natural here.

Also notice the gender:

• bloqueo is masculine → el bloqueo
• baja is feminine → la baja

In Spanish, adjectives often come after the noun.

So:

• bloqueo temporal = temporary block
• baja definitiva = permanent/definitive cancellation/deactivation

This is the normal position for many descriptive adjectives in Spanish.

You can sometimes put adjectives before the noun, but that often changes the tone, emphasis, or meaning. In this sentence, the usual and expected order is:

• noun + adjective

Because Spanish adjectives agree with the noun, but not all adjectives change in the same way.

• baja is feminine singular, so the adjective must also be feminine singular:
  • definitivo → definitiva
• bloqueo is masculine singular, but temporal has the same form for masculine and feminine singular:
  • bloqueo temporal
  • situación temporal

So:

• definitivo / definitiva changes for gender
• temporal does not change between masculine and feminine singular

Its plural does change:

• bloqueos temporales
• bajas temporales

It could be either present or preterite.

That is a very common question because many -ar verbs have the same form for:

• present nosotros
• preterite nosotros

For comparar:

• present: comparamos = we compare
• preterite: comparamos = we compared

Context tells you which one is meant:

• Ahora comparamos... → present
• Ayer comparamos... → past

So if you see comparamos by itself, don’t assume the tense only from the form.

They are adjectives modifying the nouns:

• temporal describes bloqueo
• definitiva describes baja

They narrow the meaning:

• not just any bloqueo, but a temporary one
• not just any baja, but a definitive/permanent one

So the sentence is contrasting two specific types of actions or states.

Even if the overall meaning is already clear, learners often want to know why two different nouns are used.

In general:

• bloqueo suggests a block, restriction, or suspension
• baja often refers to a removal, cancellation, deactivation, or deregistration

So they are not interchangeable.

A rough way to think about it is:

• bloqueo temporal = something is blocked for a while
• baja definitiva = something is fully removed or permanently deactivated

In Spain especially, dar de baja is a very common expression for cancelling or unregistering something.

Yes. Spanish allows some flexibility.

For example, you could also say:

• Comparamos la baja definitiva con el bloqueo temporal.

That changes the order of the two items being compared, but the structure is still correct.

The original version simply chooses to mention el bloqueo temporal first. Unless context gives special emphasis, both versions are grammatically fine.

Not in this sentence.

For comparing one thing directly with another, con is the normal preposition:

• comparar A con B

Using entre would not work the same way here.

So the natural choice is:

• Comparamos el bloqueo temporal con la baja definitiva.

not

• Comparamos el bloqueo temporal entre la baja definitiva.

It sounds correct and fairly formal/technical, mainly because of the nouns:

• bloqueo
• baja
• definitiva
• temporal

This kind of wording is common in administrative, legal, digital, or business contexts.

A more everyday sentence would depend on the situation, but grammatically this sentence is completely natural.