Log inSign up

На лестнице тоже было скользко, и я держалась за перила обеими руками.

На лестнице тоже было скользко, и я держалась за перила обеими руками.
The stairs were slippery too, and I held on to the handrail with both hands.

Breakdown of На лестнице тоже было скользко, и я держалась за перила обеими руками.

я
I
быть
to be
и
and
на
on
лестница
the stairs
оба
both
рука
the hand
перила
the handrail
держаться за
to hold on to
тоже
too/also
скользко
slippery
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Russian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Russian now

Questions & Answers about На лестнице тоже было скользко, и я держалась за перила обеими руками.

Why is it На лестнице and not на лестницу? What case is this?

На лестнице uses the prepositional case (лестница → лестнице) after на to mean location: on / on the stairs / on the staircase (i.e., where it was slippery).
На лестницу would be accusative and usually implies motion onto something (where to), e.g. я поднялась на лестницу (I stepped onto the stairs).

What exactly does тоже mean here, and why is it placed after На лестнице?

Тоже means also / too: it was slippery on the stairs as well (in addition to somewhere else mentioned earlier).
Its placement is flexible; На лестнице тоже было скользко emphasizes the location (on the stairs too). If you moved it, you’d shift emphasis, e.g. Тоже было скользко на лестнице sounds more like “It was slippery too—on the stairs.”

What’s the difference between тоже and также? Could I replace it?

Often yes, both mean also. Differences:

  • тоже is very common in everyday speech and often implies “as well / same as”.
  • также is a bit more neutral/formal and sometimes feels like “also / likewise” in a listing sense.
    In this sentence, также would work: На лестнице также было скользко.
Why is it было скользко (neuter было) when лестница is feminine?

Because было скользко is an impersonal construction: literally “it was slippery.”
скользко here is not an adjective agreeing with лестница; it’s a predicative/state word (category of state), describing the situation/environment. That’s why Russian uses neuter было.

So why not say лестница была скользкая?

You can. The difference is style/structure:

  • На лестнице было скользко = “On the stairs it was slippery” (focus on the conditions in that place).
  • Лестница была скользкая = “The staircase was slippery” (focus on the staircase itself as an object).
    Both are natural; the impersonal version is extremely common for weather/conditions.
Why is there a comma before и?

Because it connects two independent clauses: 1) На лестнице тоже было скользко
2) я держалась за перила обеими руками
Russian typically uses a comma before и in this situation (like English often would).

Why is the verb держалась feminine? What would a male speaker say?

Past tense in Russian agrees with the subject in gender/number:

  • female speaker: я держалась
  • male speaker: я держался
  • plural: мы держались
What does держалась mean exactly, and why is it reflexive (-ся)?

держаться means to hold on (to something), to keep oneself supported. The reflexive -ся signals that the subject is maintaining their own position/stability (not just “holding” an object).
Compare:

  • держать (я держала перила) = “I was holding the rail” (more like you have it in your hands)
  • держаться за перила = “I was holding on to the rail” (for support/balance)
Why is it за перила? What case is that, and why not another preposition?

With держаться, the standard pattern is держаться за + accusative (“hold on to”).
So перила here is accusative plural (it looks the same as nominative because it’s inanimate plural).
Another common option is держаться/держатьcя за поручень (singular “handrail”), but перила is also very common.

What are перила grammatically? Why is it plural?

перила is a plural-only noun in Russian (like “scissors” in English). There isn’t a normal singular перило used in everyday speech for “one rail.”
So you say перила even if there’s effectively one handrail.

Why is it обеими руками and not две руки or двумя руками?

Because the sentence needs the meaning “with (both) hands”, which in Russian uses the instrumental case for “by means of / using”: руками.

  • обеими руками = with both hands (explicitly “both”)
  • двумя руками = with two hands (grammatical, but less idiomatic when you specifically mean “both of your hands”)
What case is обеими, and how is it formed?

обеими is instrumental plural of обе (“both,” feminine/plural form).
Instrumental plural endings:

  • обе → обеими
  • руки → руками
    So the phrase matches in case/number: обеими руками.
Could the word order be different, and would the meaning change?

Yes, Russian word order is flexible, but emphasis changes:

  • На лестнице тоже было скользко = emphasizes location (“on the stairs too”)
  • Тоже на лестнице было скользко = emphasizes “also” more strongly
  • Я держалась обеими руками за перила = emphasizes both hands before the object
    The basic meaning stays the same in all of these.