După deparazitare, nu mai găsim căpușe sau purici în blană.

It means after the parasite treatment or after deparasitization.

• după = after
• deparazitare = parasite removal / parasite treatment

So this phrase sets the time frame for the rest of the sentence: after the treatment, ...

Deparazitare is a broad veterinary/medical word for removing or treating parasites.

Depending on context, it can refer to:

• deworming (internal parasites)
• treatment against fleas, ticks, etc. (external parasites)
• or parasite treatment in general

In this sentence, because it mentions căpușe (ticks) and purici (fleas), it clearly refers to some kind of anti-parasite treatment for an animal.

It comes from the verb a deparazita = to deparasite / to treat against parasites.

Because Romanian often uses a bare noun after prepositions when speaking about an event in a general way.

So:

• după deparazitare = after parasite treatment / after the treatment

You could sometimes also hear a more specific version like:

• după deparazitarea câinelui = after the dog's deparasitization
• după deparazitarea aceasta = after this treatment

But in your sentence, the noun is used in a general, natural way, so no article is needed.

Because nu mai is a very common Romanian combination meaning:

• no longer
• not anymore
• not ... any more

Here:

• nu = not
• mai often adds the idea of still / anymore / further

So:

• mai găsim = we still find / we find anymore depending on context
• nu mai găsim = we no longer find

This is one of the most important Romanian patterns to learn:

• Mai stai? = Are you staying longer? / Are you still staying?
• Nu mai stau. = I’m not staying anymore.

Găsim is the 1st person plural present of a găsi = to find.

So literally:

• găsim = we find

Full breakdown:

• după deparazitare = after the treatment
• nu mai găsim = we no longer find
• căpușe sau purici = ticks or fleas
• în blană = in the fur

Romanian often uses we in a fairly general way, especially when talking about what people observe in a situation. In English, depending on context, you might translate it as:

• we no longer find
• you no longer find
• there are no longer any ... found

Yes. Romanian could also use a more impersonal/passive-style construction, for example:

• După deparazitare, nu se mai găsesc căpușe sau purici în blană.

That means something like:

• After treatment, ticks or fleas are no longer found in the fur.

But nu mai găsim sounds natural and direct, especially if the speaker means we, when we check the animal.

Yes, both are plural.

Singular and plural:

• o căpușă = a tick

• căpușe = ticks

• un purice = a flea
• purici = fleas

So the sentence is talking about multiple possible parasites, not just one.

Because they are indefinite plural nouns here, and that is very natural after a negative expression like nu mai găsim.

So:

• nu mai găsim căpușe sau purici = we no longer find ticks or fleas
• more naturally in English: we no longer find any ticks or fleas

Romanian often does not need a separate word for any in this kind of sentence. The bare plural already works well.

If you said:

• căpușele / puricii

that would mean:

• the ticks / the fleas

which sounds much more specific.

Because in negative sentences, Romanian often uses sau where English also commonly uses or:

• nu mai găsim căpușe sau purici = we no longer find ticks or fleas

This means neither ticks nor fleas are found.

Using și would sound less natural here. Sau fits the idea of any of these parasites.

Literally, it means in the fur.

• în = in
• blană = fur, coat (of an animal)

For animals, blană refers to their hairy coat/fur. In natural English, you might translate în blană as:

• in the fur
• in the coat
• sometimes even on the animal’s fur, depending on style

Romanian uses în here in a perfectly normal way.

Not completely. Romanian word order is fairly flexible, but the given order is very natural.

Current order:

• După deparazitare, nu mai găsim căpușe sau purici în blană.

This puts the time phrase first:

• After treatment, ...

That is a common and clear way to organize the sentence.

You could rearrange parts, but some versions sound more natural than others. The original sentence is a very standard, good choice.

The main special letters here are:

• ă in după, deparazitare, căpușe, blană
• ș in căpușe

A quick guide:

• ă = a short central vowel, somewhat like the a in English sofa, but shorter and clearer
• ș = sh as in ship

So:

• după ≈ DOO-puh
• căpușe ≈ kuh-POO-she

Not exact English spelling, of course, but that gives you the basic idea.

Mostly, yes. Blană usually refers to:

• an animal’s fur
• or fur as a material

So in this sentence it clearly means the animal’s coat/fur.

For human hair, Romanian would not use blană. It would use words like:

• păr = hair

So în blană is specifically animal-related language.