Sign inSign up

Podes passar a esfregona no chão da sala, por favor?

Podes passar a esfregona no chão da sala, por favor?
Can you mop the living room floor, please?
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Portuguese grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Portuguese now

Questions & Answers about Podes passar a esfregona no chão da sala, por favor?

What does podes tell me about the person I’m talking to, and why isn’t tu written?
  • Podes is the 2nd person singular present of poder (you can), so it addresses one person with informal tu.
  • European Portuguese normally drops subject pronouns, since the verb ending already shows the person. Tu podes… is possible, but you don’t need the tu here.
  • If you’re addressing someone formally (using você), you’d say Pode passar…. For a group: Podem passar… (informal plural) or Podem/Poderão passar… in more formal contexts.
Is this polite? How does it compare with other ways to ask?
  • Podes passar…? is a polite, everyday request among people you address with tu.
  • Softer/less direct with tu: Podias passar…? (imperfect softens the request, like “could you?”).
  • With você (more formal): Pode passar…?; softer: Podia passar…? More formal still: Poderia passar…? (often written or very formal).
  • Adding por favor is a universal politeness booster in any of these.
Why use passar here? Why not limpar or esfregar?
  • In Portuguese, passar + [tool] is the natural collocation for running a tool over a surface: passar a esfregona (mop), passar o aspirador (vacuum), passar a ferro (iron).
  • Limpar is general “to clean” and doesn’t specify the tool.
  • Esfregar is “to scrub” (with force), not the standard way to say “to mop.”
Why is it a esfregona and not just esfregona?
  • Portuguese usually uses the definite article with tools/objects used in a generic way: passar a esfregona, passar o aspirador.
  • Passar esfregona (without the article) sounds wrong.
  • You’d use uma esfregona only if you mean “a mop (one mop, not a specific one).”
Is esfregona the usual word in Portugal? Any alternatives?
  • In Portugal, esfregona is the standard word for “mop.”
  • You’ll also hear mopa (borrowed/brand-influenced), especially in shops or with flat mops: passar a mopa.
  • Avoid esfregão in Portugal for “mop”; it’s usually a scouring pad or scrubbing brush.
  • In Brazil, people more often say passar o pano (no chão), passar o mop, or passar o rodo com pano; esfregona is not usual there.
What does no chão da sala literally mean, and how are those little words formed?
  • no = em + o (“on the/in the” + masculine singular). So no chão = “on the floor.”
  • da = de + a (“of the” + feminine singular). So da sala = “of the living room.”
  • Together, no chão da sala = “on the floor of the living room.”
Could I just say na sala instead of no chão da sala?
  • Na sala (“in the living room”) is fine if context makes the floor obvious. But no chão da sala specifies the floor explicitly.
  • If you want to emphasize covering the whole surface, you can also hear pelo chão da sala (from por + o), meaning “across the living-room floor.”
Is ao chão ever correct here?
  • No. Ao = a + o suggests direction (“to the”). You’re not moving the mop “to the floor”; you’re using it “on the floor.” Use no chão (or pelo chão), not ao chão.
Where can I put por favor?
  • All are fine and natural:
    • Por favor, podes passar a esfregona…?
    • Podes, por favor, passar a esfregona…?
    • Podes passar a esfregona…, por favor? (your sentence)
  • In Portugal, you’ll also hear (se) faz favor: Podes passar a esfregona…, faz favor?
Could I use the imperative instead of podes?
  • Yes:
    • Tu (informal): Passa a esfregona no chão da sala, por favor.
    • Você (formal): Passe a esfregona no chão da sala, por favor.
    • Vocês (plural): Passem a esfregona…
  • Imperatives can feel more direct; using poder + infinitive (as in the original) softens the request.
How would this change for formality or number of people?
  • Informal singular (tu): Podes passar…? / softer: Podias passar…?
  • Formal singular (você): Pode passar…? / softer: Podia passar…?
  • Plural informal/formal (vocês): Podem passar…? / softer: Podiam passar…?
How do I pronounce the tricky parts in European Portuguese?
  • podes ≈ “PÓ-desh” (final -s like English “sh” in many regions)
  • esfregona ≈ “shfre-GOH-nuh” (initial “esf” sounds like “shf”)
  • chão ≈ “shown” with a nasal “own” (not exactly English “own”)
  • por favor ≈ “poor fɐ-VOR” (second word stressed at the end)
  • Vowels often reduce in unstressed syllables: esfregona has a very light, almost “uh”-like first and last vowel.
Is this a real question grammatically, even without inversion?
  • Yes. In European Portuguese, you typically form yes/no questions with normal word order and rising intonation: Podes passar…?
  • You don’t need to invert or add a helper word (no “do”-support like in English).
Could I replace no with pelo here?
  • Both are possible but not identical:
    • no chão focuses on the location: “on the floor.”
    • pelo chão (= por + o) suggests movement across/throughout: “over/across the floor.”
  • For a simple request, no chão da sala is perfectly natural; pelo chão da sala emphasizes coverage.
What’s the difference between chão, piso, and andar?
  • chão = the physical floor surface inside a room.
  • piso = floor/level of a building (also used in construction contexts).
  • andar = storey/level of a building (1st floor, 2nd floor, etc.).
  • For mopping, use chão.
Any colloquial alternatives I might hear in Portugal?
  • Dás uma passagem com a esfregona na sala? (give it a quick once-over with the mop)
  • Podes passar a mopa na sala? (with the loanword)
  • Shorter: Podes passar a esfregona na sala? (dropping “no chão” since a mop implies the floor)
How would I answer this request politely?
  • Agreeing: Claro. / Já vou. / Sim, passo já.
  • Delaying/refusing politely: Agora não posso, desculpa. / Daqui a pouco faço isso. / Posso fazer depois?