Breakdown of Po oparzeniu nie wolno dotykać skóry brudną ręką ani zakładać zbyt ciasnego bandaża.
Questions & Answers about Po oparzeniu nie wolno dotykać skóry brudną ręką ani zakładać zbyt ciasnego bandaża.
What does nie wolno mean here, and how is it different from nie można?
Nie wolno means it is not allowed / one must not. It expresses a rule, prohibition, or strong instruction.
So in this sentence:
Po oparzeniu nie wolno...
= After a burn, you must not...
By contrast, nie można often means one cannot / it is not possible / it is not allowed, depending on context. It can sometimes sound a bit less like a strict rule and more like inability or general impossibility.
Here, nie wolno is a very natural choice because the sentence gives a medical warning or instruction.
Why is it po oparzeniu and not po oparzenie?
Because the preposition po here requires the locative case.
- oparzenie = a burn (dictionary form, nominative)
- po oparzeniu = after a burn / after being burned
So the noun changes:
- nominative: oparzenie
- locative: oparzeniu
This is a very common pattern:
- po obiedzie = after dinner
- po wypadku = after the accident
- po oparzeniu = after a burn
Does po oparzeniu mean after the burn or after being burned?
It can naturally be understood as after a burn or after being burned. In English, we often translate it more smoothly as:
- After a burn
- After being burned
- In the case of a burn
In practical context, it refers to what you should or should not do once the burn has happened.
Why are dotykać and zakładać in the infinitive?
Because they depend on nie wolno.
In Polish, after expressions like wolno / nie wolno, you normally use the infinitive:
- Nie wolno palić. = You must not smoke.
- Nie wolno wchodzić. = No entry / You must not enter.
- Nie wolno dotykać... ani zakładać... = You must not touch... or put on...
So:
- dotykać = to touch
- zakładać = to put on / apply
Why is it skóry and not skórę?
Because the verb dotykać usually takes the genitive case, not the accusative.
- skóra = skin
- genitive singular: skóry
So:
- dotykać skóry = to touch the skin
This is a very important pattern:
- dotykać stołu = to touch the table
- dotykać twarzy = to touch the face
- dotykać skóry = to touch the skin
A learner might expect accusative because English uses a direct object (touch the skin), but in Polish dotykać traditionally governs the genitive.
Why is it brudną ręką and not brudna ręka?
Because ręką is in the instrumental case.
Here brudną ręką means with a dirty hand. In Polish, when you express the means/tool/body part used to do something, the instrumental is very common.
- ręka = hand
- instrumental singular: ręką
- brudna → brudną to agree with ręką
So:
- brudną ręką = with a dirty hand
Compare:
- pisać długopisem = to write with a pen
- jeść widelcem = to eat with a fork
- dotykać brudną ręką = to touch with a dirty hand
Why is there no word for with, if brudną ręką means with a dirty hand?
Because Polish often expresses with/by means of just through the instrumental case, without a separate word.
So English says:
- with a dirty hand
But Polish can simply say:
- brudną ręką
The case ending itself helps express the meaning of with.
What does ani mean here?
Ani means nor in this sentence.
The structure is:
nie wolno A ani B
= you must not A nor B
more natural English: you must neither A nor B
So:
nie wolno dotykać skóry brudną ręką ani zakładać zbyt ciasnego bandaża
= you must neither touch the skin with a dirty hand nor apply a bandage that is too tight
After a negative expression like nie wolno, ani is the natural connector.
Why is it zbyt ciasnego bandaża and not zbyt ciasny bandaż?
There are two things happening here.
First, ciasnego bandaża is a noun phrase meaning a tight bandage:
- bandaż = bandage
- ciasny = tight
Second, after a negative structure, Polish often uses the genitive instead of the accusative for the object. That is why you see:
- zbyt ciasnego bandaża
rather than the expected accusative-like form.
So this part means:
- not to put on too tight a bandage
This genitive after negation is a classic Polish feature, although in modern Polish usage some verbs and contexts vary. In a sentence like this, the genitive sounds very natural and standard.
What does zbyt mean, and how is it different from bardzo?
Zbyt means too in the sense of excessively.
- zbyt ciasny = too tight
- bardzo ciasny = very tight
So:
- bardzo = very
- zbyt = too much / excessively
In this sentence, zbyt is important because it warns against something dangerous: a bandage that is too tight, not just tight.
What exactly does zakładać mean here?
Here zakładać means to put on / apply.
In medical or practical contexts, it can be used for things like:
- zakładać bandaż = to put on a bandage
- zakładać opatrunek = to apply a dressing
So in this sentence it does not mean things like to assume or to found, which are other meanings of zakładać in different contexts.
Why is dotykać used instead of dotknąć?
This is about aspect.
- dotykać = imperfective
- dotknąć = perfective
After nie wolno, the imperfective infinitive is very common when talking about a general prohibition:
- Nie wolno dotykać. = You must not touch.
- Nie wolno palić. = You must not smoke.
The imperfective focuses on the action as a general activity, not a single completed event. That makes it the normal choice in instructions and warnings.
Is the word order flexible here?
Yes, Polish word order is fairly flexible, but this sentence is in a very natural, neutral order for instructions.
Current order:
Po oparzeniu nie wolno dotykać skóry brudną ręką ani zakładać zbyt ciasnego bandaża.
This sounds clear and standard.
You could sometimes rearrange parts for emphasis, but not every version sounds equally natural. For example, moving po oparzeniu or brudną ręką is possible in some contexts, but the original order is probably the best one for a learner to model.
Can this sentence be translated literally as After a burn it is not free to touch the skin...?
Not naturally. Even though wolno is historically connected with the idea of something being permitted, the whole expression nie wolno should be learned as a set phrase meaning:
- one must not
- it is forbidden to
- it is not allowed to
So it is better not to translate word by word. Treat nie wolno + infinitive as one useful pattern.
What cases are used in the whole sentence?
Here is a breakdown:
Po oparzeniu
- po
- oparzeniu = locative singular of oparzenie
dotykać skóry
- dotykać takes the genitive
- skóry = genitive singular of skóra
brudną ręką
- instrumental
- ręką = instrumental singular of ręka
- brudną matches it
zbyt ciasnego bandaża
So this sentence is a good example of how Polish often relies on case endings where English relies on word order or prepositions.
What is the basic dictionary form of each important word here?
Here are the main forms:
- po = after
- oparzenie = burn
- nie wolno = must not / not allowed
- dotykać = to touch
- skóra = skin
- brudny = dirty
- ręka = hand
- ani = nor
- zakładać = to put on / apply
- zbyt = too, excessively
- ciasny = tight
- bandaż = bandage
This is often helpful because many words in the sentence are not in their dictionary form.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning PolishMaster Polish — from Po oparzeniu nie wolno dotykać skóry brudną ręką ani zakładać zbyt ciasnego bandaża to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions