Czy ma Pani już spakowane kalosze i przygotowaną apteczkę na jutrzejszy wyjazd?

Czy is a yes/no question particle. It marks the sentence as a question, like English do / does / is / are help do in some questions. It does not translate to one single English word by itself.

So:

Czy ma Pani już spakowane kalosze...?
= Do you already have your rubber boots packed...?

In spoken Polish, czy can sometimes be omitted if the intonation already makes it clear that it is a question.

Because Pani is the formal word for you when speaking to a woman, and formal Pan / Pani uses third-person singular verb forms.

So:

• masz = informal you have
• ma Pani = formal you have when speaking to a woman

Literally, it behaves a bit like Does Madam have..., but in normal English we simply translate it as Do you have...

Compare:

• Czy masz...? = informal
• Czy ma Pani...? = formal to a woman
• Czy ma Pan...? = formal to a man

In Polish, Pan, Pani, and Państwo are often capitalized in direct polite address, especially in writing, to show respect.

So Pani with a capital letter is a politeness convention. You may also see lowercase pani in less formal contexts or in some printed materials, but the capitalized form is very common when directly addressing someone politely.

They are in the accusative case, because they are the direct objects of mieć (to have).

• mieć kalosze = to have boots
• mieć apteczkę = to have a first-aid kit

Why do they look different?

• apteczka is feminine singular, and its accusative form is apteczkę
• kalosze is plural, and here its accusative form looks the same as its nominative form

So the case is the same, but the endings behave differently.

Because they must agree with the nouns they describe.

• spakowane describes kalosze
• przygotowaną describes apteczkę

In Polish, these kinds of forms agree in gender, number, and case.

So here:

• kalosze = plural, accusative, non-masculine-personal form
  → spakowane
• apteczkę = feminine singular accusative
  → przygotowaną

They do not agree with Pani. They agree with the things being packed/prepared.

No. They are not normal past-tense verb forms like spakowała or przygotowała.

Here they are better understood as participial/adjectival forms, meaning something like:

• packed
• prepared

So the structure means:

• mieć spakowane kalosze = to have the boots packed
• mieć przygotowaną apteczkę = to have the first-aid kit prepared

This is very similar to English have something done/prepared/packed.

It describes the state of something that someone has ready.

So:

• Mam spakowaną torbę. = I have my bag packed.
• Ma Pani przygotowaną apteczkę. = You have the first-aid kit prepared.

The focus is on the result or readiness of the object, not just on the action itself.

In this sentence, the speaker is asking whether the boots and the first-aid kit are already ready for the trip.

Because Polish often leaves out possessive words when ownership is obvious from context.

In English, we usually say:

• your boots
• your first-aid kit

In Polish, if it is clear whose things we mean, it is very natural to say simply:

• kalosze
• apteczkę

You could add a possessive for emphasis, for example:

• swoje kalosze
• swoją apteczkę

but it is not necessary here.

Już means already.

It suggests that the speaker expects this preparation may have been completed by now.

So the sentence has the feeling of:

Do you already have the rubber boots packed and the first-aid kit prepared for tomorrow’s trip?

The position of już is natural here, but Polish word order is flexible, so it can move slightly for emphasis.

It means for tomorrow’s trip / departure.

• na = for
• jutrzejszy = tomorrow’s
• wyjazd = trip, departure, going away

So this phrase tells us what the preparations are for.

It does not mean simply tomorrow. It specifically means for the trip that is tomorrow.

Because na often takes the accusative when it means for, for an occasion, or for a purpose.

Here:

• wyjazd is masculine singular
• the accusative singular form is wyjazd
• jutrzejszy matches it, so we get jutrzejszy wyjazd

So na jutrzejszy wyjazd is an ordinary na + accusative phrase meaning for tomorrow’s trip.

Not exactly.

• wyjazd usually emphasizes going away, leaving, or a trip out
• podróż means journey or travel more generally

In this sentence, wyjazd fits well because it sounds like a planned outing, departure, or trip away, perhaps something practical like an excursion, hike, or short trip.

• kalosze = rubber boots, often also wellies in British English
• apteczka = first-aid kit or medical kit

Although apteczka is related to apteka (pharmacy), in this kind of sentence it usually means a small kit of medicines or first-aid supplies that you take with you.

Yes. Polish word order is much more flexible than English word order, because the endings carry a lot of the grammatical information.

This sentence is a natural neutral version:

Czy ma Pani już spakowane kalosze i przygotowaną apteczkę na jutrzejszy wyjazd?

But other orders are possible, for example to shift emphasis:

• Czy już ma Pani spakowane kalosze...?
• Na jutrzejszy wyjazd ma Pani już spakowane kalosze...?

The meaning stays basically the same, but the focus changes a little.

You would change the form of address.

Informal singular:

Czy masz już spakowane kalosze i przygotowaną apteczkę na jutrzejszy wyjazd?

Formal to a man:

Czy ma Pan już spakowane kalosze i przygotowaną apteczkę na jutrzejszy wyjazd?

Formal to more than one person:

Czy mają Państwo już spakowane kalosze i przygotowaną apteczkę na jutrzejszy wyjazd?

The rest of the sentence stays the same.